16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 Practice <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SAT</strong><br />

Practice Test Five Answers and Explanations I<br />

485<br />

18. D<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

When in doubt, remember that <strong>the</strong> correct answer choice<br />

will match up with <strong>the</strong> tone that <strong>the</strong> author has established<br />

in his passage. Your first big clue to answering this question<br />

is <strong>the</strong> author's statement that turntablists and o<strong>the</strong>r DJs are<br />

unfairly lumped toge<strong>the</strong>r. The second clue is <strong>the</strong> contrast<br />

between his descriptions of turntablists as innovative and<br />

groundbreaking and <strong>the</strong> dance club DJs, who simply spin<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r per<strong>for</strong>mers' vinyl records. Look <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> answer that best<br />

describes what <strong>the</strong>se two clues express about <strong>the</strong> author's<br />

intentions <strong>for</strong> making <strong>the</strong> comparison.<br />

Choice (A) is distortion; <strong>the</strong> author feels it is necessary to<br />

define <strong>the</strong> difference between turntablists and dance club<br />

DJs; radio announcers are never mentioned. Choice (B) is<br />

out of scope; <strong>the</strong>re is nothing in <strong>the</strong> passage to suggest that<br />

<strong>the</strong> author <strong>for</strong>got to make this clarification. Choice (C) is<br />

distortion; <strong>the</strong> author only refers to turntablists as innovators.<br />

Choice (D) matches your prediction. Choice (E) is extreme;<br />

though <strong>the</strong> author does question <strong>the</strong> talents of dance club<br />

and wedding DJs, he never makes <strong>the</strong> extreme suggestion<br />

that it is not possible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong>m to possess talent.<br />

19. c<br />

Difficulty: Low<br />

You should be predicting <strong>the</strong> author's purpose on every<br />

passage you read. All you have to do <strong>the</strong>n is look <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

match. In <strong>the</strong> first sentence of <strong>the</strong> first passage, <strong>the</strong> author<br />

states that he is as equipped as anybody to offer an opinion<br />

on <strong>the</strong> debate. In <strong>the</strong> second paragraph, <strong>the</strong> author reveals<br />

that opinion, which is that he, a turntablist, is undoubtedly a<br />

musician. Using examples and comparisons, he uses <strong>the</strong> rest<br />

of <strong>the</strong> passage to support his stance on <strong>the</strong> subject. Look <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> choice that best sums this up.<br />

Choice (A) is distortion; <strong>the</strong> turntablist techniques of cutting,<br />

mixing, and beat juggling are mentioned in <strong>the</strong> passage,<br />

but <strong>the</strong>y are not described in any way and serve only as<br />

supporting details. Choice (B) is distortion; this is <strong>the</strong> main<br />

purpose of <strong>the</strong> second passage. Choice (C) matches your<br />

prediction. Choice (D) is an opposite; <strong>the</strong> author's position<br />

on <strong>the</strong> debate is clearly stated-he is not a neutral party.<br />

Choice (E) is distortion. In attempting to support his side<br />

of <strong>the</strong> argument, <strong>the</strong> author is indeed disputing <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r;<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> passage never states that this opposing view is<br />

<strong>the</strong> more accepted of <strong>the</strong> two.<br />

20. E<br />

Difficulty: High<br />

How does <strong>the</strong> author feel about <strong>the</strong> strict definitions of <strong>the</strong><br />

words in question? Each author uses <strong>the</strong> respective word in<br />

quotation marks within <strong>the</strong> context of questioning <strong>the</strong> word's<br />

strict definition. The author of Passage 1 puts stole in quotes,<br />

as he is questioning originality in popular music; <strong>the</strong> author<br />

of Passage 2 puts musician in quotes while attempting to<br />

discount its strict definition. Think about why each author<br />

would choose to put quotes around those words in those<br />

particular situations, <strong>the</strong>n look <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> choice that best<br />

reflects your prediction.<br />

Choice (A) is an opposite; using <strong>the</strong> strictest definition of<br />

both words would weaken each author's argument. Choice<br />

(B) is distortion; certainly both words are important in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

respective sentences, but <strong>the</strong> quotes cannot and do not<br />

emphasize that. Choice (C) is distortion; this is one of <strong>the</strong><br />

basic uses of quotation marks, but this purpose is not served<br />

here. Choice (D) is out of scope; nei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong>se words<br />

have alternate meanings in music terminology; even if<br />

<strong>the</strong>y did, <strong>the</strong> authors don't employ <strong>the</strong>m here. Choice (E)<br />

matches your prediction.<br />

21. c<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

Read <strong>the</strong> lines around <strong>the</strong> reference, if necessary, to<br />

establish context. One of <strong>the</strong> ways <strong>the</strong> author achieves<br />

<strong>the</strong> passage's overall purpose is by demonstrating that <strong>the</strong><br />

actual definition of musician is too vague to be <strong>the</strong> basis of<br />

an argument. The discussion about <strong>the</strong> academic point of<br />

view is an example of this; she offers it to <strong>the</strong> reader and<br />

subsequently challenges it to prove her point. Look <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

answer that best sums this up.<br />

Choice (A) is extreme; to suggest that all music professors<br />

will never consider turntablists to be musicians is much<br />

too extreme to be a valid choice. Choice (B) is distortion;<br />

this choice makes no sense because in <strong>the</strong> discussion<br />

<strong>the</strong> author successfully weakens <strong>the</strong> academic argumnt.<br />

Choice (C) matches your prediction nicely. Choice (D) is<br />

an opposite; this discussion demonstrates that <strong>the</strong>re is no<br />

irrefutable argument. Choice (E) is out of scope; this is<br />

never suggested in <strong>the</strong> passage.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!