16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 61<br />

Practice Test Ten<br />

879<br />

Questions 21-24 are based on <strong>the</strong> following passages.<br />

Passage I<br />

The recently legislated "do-not-call" registry<br />

aimed at blocking telemarketers' access to private<br />

households has been an exceedingly popular move<br />

Line by <strong>the</strong> federal government. For many Americans<br />

(5) who are growing increasingly frustrated with unsolicited<br />

marketing calls interrupting dinnertime or<br />

Sunday morning snoozes, <strong>the</strong> new list of roughly<br />

50 million names has provided some relief. For<br />

those who once filled <strong>the</strong> estimated 2 million tele-<br />

( 10) services industry jobs that will be lost, however,<br />

this reprieve will likely go unappreciated. As a<br />

result of this conflict, <strong>the</strong> list has been taken into<br />

<strong>the</strong> courts, where <strong>the</strong> federal commission charged<br />

with overseeing <strong>the</strong> registry will square off against<br />

(15) <strong>the</strong> lawsuits of nearly 5,000 telemarketing-reliant<br />

companies.<br />

Passage 2<br />

The newly drafted "do-not-call" legislation,<br />

while popular among millions of American<br />

consumers, has appropriately set off a free speech<br />

(20) debate in <strong>the</strong> federal court system. Proponents of<br />

<strong>the</strong> bill, which allows individuals to register <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

phone numbers as unavailable to telemarketers,<br />

argue that <strong>the</strong> new directive is simply a long overdue<br />

step to protect consumers from unsolicited<br />

(25) marketing intrusions into <strong>the</strong>ir private lives. The<br />

reality, however, is undeniably more complicated<br />

than this slant suggests. The argument can certainly<br />

be made that <strong>the</strong> registry unduly discriminates<br />

against certain marketing tools and, subsequently,<br />

(30) <strong>the</strong> products <strong>the</strong>y promote. It is impossible to<br />

determine that one intrusion, say, a highway<br />

billboard, is less severe than ano<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

21. The teleservices workers mentioned in Passage<br />

1 would most likely consider <strong>the</strong> "do-not-call"<br />

registry<br />

(A) a necessary restriction<br />

(B) a divisive <strong>for</strong>ce<br />

(C) unlawful legislation<br />

(D) a temporary nuisance<br />

(E) a destruction of <strong>the</strong>ir livelihood<br />

22. In line 27, "slant" most nearly means<br />

(A) decline<br />

(B) influence<br />

( C) distortion<br />

(D) opinion<br />

(E) deviation<br />

23. Which aspect of <strong>the</strong> "do-not-call" legislation is<br />

discussed in Passage 2, but not in Passage 1?<br />

(A) Its popularity<br />

(B) Its fairness<br />

( C) Its subjectivity<br />

(D) Its conflict with free speech<br />

(E) Its impact on employment<br />

24. Which of <strong>the</strong> following is a focus that is shared by<br />

<strong>the</strong> two passages?<br />

(A) The costs of <strong>the</strong> registry <strong>for</strong> consumers<br />

(B) The registry's enormous impact on<br />

telemarketers<br />

(C) The great societal need <strong>the</strong> legislation has<br />

filled<br />

(D) The role courts will play in <strong>the</strong> registry's<br />

composition<br />

(E) The potential drawbacks of <strong>the</strong> legislation<br />

STOP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!