16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 Practice <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SAT</strong><br />

Practice Test Six Answers and Explanations 575<br />

I<br />

prediction well. Choice (E) is an irrelevant detail; <strong>the</strong> author<br />

of Passage 1 might agree with this, but it is not very relevant<br />

to anything in Passage 2.<br />

22. c<br />

Difficulty: High<br />

In order to make an accurate prediction, you need a good<br />

grasp of <strong>the</strong> specific section cited <strong>for</strong> Passage 2 as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> general claims of Passage 1. If you have highlighted<br />

or summarized each passage's main points, it should only<br />

take you a few seconds to refamiliarize yourself with <strong>the</strong><br />

major arguments in Passage 1. The author of Passage 2 is<br />

promoting <strong>the</strong> power of human intelligence, whereas <strong>the</strong><br />

author of Passage 1 generally believes that our estimation<br />

of our own intelligence is inflated by <strong>the</strong> ease with which<br />

we communicate. Predict that <strong>the</strong> correct answer choice will<br />

take both of <strong>the</strong>se viewpoints into account.<br />

Choice (A) is distortion; <strong>the</strong> author of Passage 1 asserts that<br />

only humans are capable of language, so it is unlikely that<br />

he would consider a similar assertion unfair. Choice (B) is<br />

an opposite; <strong>the</strong> author of Passage 1 argues that language is<br />

actually <strong>the</strong> distinguishing factor between humans and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

animals. Choice (C) is a good fit <strong>for</strong> your prediction. Choice<br />

(D) is out of scope; such an opinion is not within <strong>the</strong> bounds<br />

of <strong>the</strong> arguments in Passage 1, and it misinterprets <strong>the</strong> point<br />

being made in Passage 2. Choice (E) is an irrelevant detail;<br />

it is actually <strong>the</strong> author of Passage 2 who mentions social<br />

psychology, not <strong>the</strong> author of Passage 1.<br />

23. E<br />

Difficulty: High<br />

The author is making a comparison between humans and<br />

<strong>the</strong>se o<strong>the</strong>r mammals, but he qualifies his statement by<br />

noting that human behavior is also more complex. Predict<br />

that <strong>the</strong> correct answer choice involves this compromise.<br />

Choice (A) is an opposite; since <strong>the</strong> author is making<br />

this comparison himself, it seems unlikely that he would<br />

consider it preposterous. Choice (B) is an irrelevant<br />

detail; this sort of thinking is more in line with <strong>the</strong> author<br />

of Passage 1, not Passage 2. Choice (C) is distortion; <strong>the</strong><br />

author of Passage 2 never asserts that <strong>the</strong> human social<br />

structure is weaker than o<strong>the</strong>r animals'. Choice (D) is out of<br />

scope; <strong>the</strong>re is nothing in Passage 2 to suggest this. Choice<br />

(E) is <strong>the</strong> best match <strong>for</strong> your prediction.<br />

24. A<br />

Difficulty: High<br />

This question relies on your knowledge of <strong>the</strong> main ideas<br />

in each passage, so if you have those written down already,<br />

it will help you to briefly go over <strong>the</strong>m be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>for</strong>mulating a<br />

prediction. If you're having trouble making a decision, you<br />

can always skim <strong>the</strong> passages again to see if <strong>the</strong>y seem<br />

to contradict a potential answer choice. The first author<br />

tends to insist that human intelligence is partially an illusion<br />

arising from <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of our communication, while<br />

<strong>the</strong> second author assumes <strong>the</strong> more conventional belief<br />

that humans are far more intelligent than all o<strong>the</strong>r animals.<br />

Expect <strong>the</strong> correct answer choice to hinge on this distinction.<br />

Choice (A) is a good match <strong>for</strong> your prediction. Choice (B)<br />

is an irrelevant detail; this choice partially agrees with points<br />

in Passage 1, but <strong>the</strong>se arguments are wholly irrelevant<br />

to <strong>the</strong> topics discussed in Passage 2. Choice (C) is out of<br />

scope; nei<strong>the</strong>r passage focuses on <strong>the</strong> relative influences<br />

of society and genetics on intelligence. Choice (D) is an<br />

opposite; this choice directly contradicts an argument made<br />

by <strong>the</strong> first author and distorts <strong>the</strong> arguments of <strong>the</strong> second<br />

author. Choice (E) is out of scope; nei<strong>the</strong>r passage is really<br />

concerned with humanity's moral failings or <strong>the</strong> survival of<br />

human society.<br />

SECTION 6<br />

1. B<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

Strategic Advice: Most people find it easier to work<br />

with negative exponents if <strong>the</strong>y are written as fractions.<br />

Remember that a rational function is undefined when<br />

its denominator equals zero. Can any part of f(x) be<br />

undefined?<br />

Getting to <strong>the</strong> Answer:<br />

1<br />

f (x) =x-3 +x3 = - +x3<br />

x3<br />

We know is undefined when x3 = 0, that is, when x = 0.<br />

x<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, f(x) is undefined when x = 0.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!