16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 Practice <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SAT</strong><br />

Practice Test Eight Answers and Explanations I 743<br />

8. B<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

A phrase or word can have one meaning when it is isolated<br />

from <strong>the</strong> text, as it is in <strong>the</strong> question stem, and quite ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

in <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> passage. In this case, <strong>the</strong> cited words<br />

come in a sentence that not only attributes <strong>the</strong> invention of<br />

<strong>the</strong> popular montage technique to Eisenstein but that also<br />

refers to this attribution as a simple characterization. The<br />

correct answer must capture <strong>the</strong> idea that Eisenstein was<br />

more than just <strong>the</strong> creator of <strong>the</strong> montage. Choice (B) does<br />

this. Choice (A) is distortion. While <strong>the</strong> sentence as a whole<br />

underscores Eisenstein's immense contribution to film, this<br />

reference is described as one that has served to minimize<br />

this influence. Choice (D) similarly distorts in<strong>for</strong>mation from<br />

<strong>the</strong> passage. The paragraph as a whole certainly celebrates<br />

Eisenstein's important place in cinematic history, but this<br />

particular reference is used to describe how his contribution<br />

has been oversimplified. Choice (E) is an opposite answer;<br />

<strong>the</strong> cited words are used to suggest Eisenstein's influence<br />

has been somewhat minimized, not exaggerated.<br />

9. D<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

Be careful on "EXCEPT' questions. All four of <strong>the</strong> wrong<br />

answers will be contained in <strong>the</strong> passage, and <strong>the</strong> correct<br />

answer will be <strong>the</strong> exception. Because <strong>the</strong> entire paragraph<br />

describes <strong>the</strong> importance of Eisenstein's films, begin<br />

by eliminating those answer choices clearly supported<br />

by evidence in <strong>the</strong> text. Choice (A) is supported by <strong>the</strong><br />

second sentence, where <strong>the</strong> author describes Eisenstein's<br />

work as capable of clearly conveying complex images<br />

and deep plots. Choice (B) is supported by <strong>the</strong> opening<br />

sentence, where <strong>the</strong> author describes Eisenstein's use of<br />

<strong>the</strong> montage. Choice (C) is supported by <strong>the</strong> concluding<br />

sentence of <strong>the</strong> paragraph, where <strong>the</strong> author asserts that<br />

Eisenstein's audiences could enjoy his abstract expressions.<br />

Choice (E) is supported by <strong>the</strong> final sentence of <strong>the</strong><br />

paragraph. This leaves (D) as <strong>the</strong> correct answer. While<br />

<strong>the</strong> author mentions that Eisenstein's films were powerful<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> average viewer, and that <strong>the</strong>y demonstrated most<br />

viewers were capable of appreciating far more than <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment gave <strong>the</strong>m credit <strong>for</strong>, nowhere is it stated that<br />

<strong>the</strong>se works made <strong>the</strong> viewers <strong>the</strong>mselves more confident<br />

or powerful.<br />

Questions 1 0- 18<br />

The author of this passage is interested, as <strong>the</strong> introduction<br />

alerts you, in how Arabs and Americans respond differently<br />

to spatial relationships. After introducing his subject, known<br />

as <strong>the</strong> study of proxemics, <strong>the</strong> author goes on to consider<br />

various examples of <strong>the</strong> differences between Arabs and<br />

Americans. In <strong>the</strong> second paragraph, he shows how Arabs<br />

and Americans have different expectations regarding body<br />

position during a conversation. Arabs expect involvement<br />

when interacting with friends. This notion of involvement<br />

extends to public domains, according to <strong>the</strong> third paragraph;<br />

involvement and even intervention is expected on levels<br />

ranging from business transactions to government.<br />

The differences are not limited to public places, as <strong>the</strong><br />

author establishes in <strong>the</strong> last two paragraphs. Arabs arrange<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir homes to have large open spaces, thus creating an<br />

environment where personalities are intermingled. They<br />

feel socially and sensorially deprived in America. This does<br />

not mean, however, that Arabs cannot attain privacy in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own homes; <strong>the</strong>y do so merely by not talking. Since<br />

not talking has a completely different meaning in America,<br />

awkward situations-such as that of <strong>the</strong> Arab exchange<br />

student in Kansas-can arise out of miscommunication<br />

between members of <strong>the</strong> two cultures.<br />

10. D<br />

Difficulty: Low<br />

The first question is fairly straight<strong>for</strong>ward. Reading <strong>the</strong> lines<br />

directly below <strong>the</strong> phrase two conflicting sensations will<br />

clue you in to what sensations <strong>the</strong> author has in mind.<br />

Americans feel compressed and overwhelmed in public in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Middle East and exposed in <strong>the</strong> wide open spaces of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Arab home. Choice (D), crowding and spaciousness,<br />

sums up <strong>the</strong> sensations well. Choice (A) is wrong because<br />

Americans may experience confusion in <strong>the</strong> Middle East,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> author doesn't say <strong>the</strong>re is any understanding.<br />

Involvement and participation are not conflicting, nor is<br />

<strong>the</strong>re any evidence to suggest that Americans feel ei<strong>the</strong>r of<br />

<strong>the</strong> two in <strong>the</strong> Middle East. The author does not mention<br />

friendliness and hostility. Choice (E) may have been<br />

tempting because Americans do experience high noise<br />

levels in Arab public places, but <strong>the</strong> author doesn't talk<br />

about silence in <strong>the</strong> first paragraph.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!