16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 Practice <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SAT</strong><br />

Practice Test Five Answers and Explanations<br />

481<br />

I<br />

Look <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> answer choice that means interest or desire to<br />

gain in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

In (A), humankind's desire to explore is not necessarily<br />

methodical or orderly. In (B), it is <strong>the</strong> desire to understand<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than credulity, or <strong>the</strong> willingness to believe<br />

something, that makes humans explore <strong>the</strong> unknown.<br />

Choice (C) is <strong>the</strong> correct answer. Choice (D) is <strong>the</strong> opposite<br />

of <strong>the</strong> prediction. Choice (E) does not match <strong>the</strong> prediction.<br />

3. A<br />

Difficulty: Low<br />

What type of reputation would a fair and impartial judge<br />

probably have? If all you know is that <strong>the</strong> judge presided<br />

over his courtroom with fairness and impartiality, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

he probably had a reputation <strong>for</strong> being fair and impartial,<br />

so look <strong>for</strong> a word that matches this definition, such as<br />

evenhanded or just.<br />

Choice (A) is a perfect match <strong>for</strong> your prediction. In (B), a<br />

judge who was considered fair would probably not have<br />

a reputation <strong>for</strong> being immoderate, or going beyond what<br />

is moral. In (C), one cannot really be cumulative, so this<br />

choice makes little sense here. In (D), being known as fair<br />

would not necessarily make someone unproductive. In (E),<br />

being considered impartial would not necessarily make one<br />

adulatory.<br />

4. c<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

If someone felt like a fraud or a liar, what might she<br />

have professed? The word fraud is <strong>the</strong> key here; <strong>the</strong><br />

sentence is describing something Marisa did involving<br />

an un<strong>for</strong>tunate mistake that made her feel like she had<br />

lied or misrepresented <strong>the</strong> truth, which suggests she did<br />

something bad. If Marisa had made an un<strong>for</strong>tunate mistake,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n to feel like a fraud she must have denied making <strong>the</strong><br />

mistake or indicated she was blameless. Blamelessness and<br />

made are great fits <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> blanks.<br />

In (A), professing one's profundity, or depth, would<br />

not necessarily be a lie if one had actually expressed<br />

displeasure over a mistake. In (B), professing enthusiasm<br />

when one had actually condoned an un<strong>for</strong>tunate mistake<br />

would not necessarily be fraudulent. Choice (C) fits your<br />

prediction. In (D), professing one's immorality would not<br />

necessarily be a lie if one had per<strong>for</strong>med a mistake. In (E),<br />

professing repentance, or regret, would be consistent with<br />

condemning a mistake.<br />

5. c<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

How might an essay written hurriedly <strong>the</strong> night be<strong>for</strong>e be<br />

flawed? Start with <strong>the</strong> second blank; something that had<br />

been written hurriedly <strong>the</strong> night be<strong>for</strong>e might be made<br />

up of a careless assortment or mixture of in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

and research data. The words as it had been indicate<br />

that <strong>the</strong> first blank is describing <strong>the</strong> result of this problem.<br />

If Jack's essay included a careless mixture of in<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n it would probably not be very logical or articulate.<br />

Assortment and articulate make great predictions <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

blanks.<br />

In (A), if <strong>the</strong> essay were written from a careless collage of<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation, <strong>the</strong>n it probably would have been rambling.<br />

In (B), if he had written <strong>the</strong> essay from a careless<br />

development of in<strong>for</strong>mation, <strong>the</strong>n it probably would have<br />

been ambiguous. Choice (C) is a perfect match <strong>for</strong> your<br />

prediction. In (D), a careless morass of in<strong>for</strong>mation would<br />

probably lead to an unstructured or amorphous essay. In<br />

(E), a harangue refers to a loud or angry speech which<br />

would not necessarily make <strong>the</strong> essay intelligible.<br />

6. c<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

The word rebellious is a big hint that Constance Markievicz<br />

was one of <strong>the</strong> few women involved in politics. If Markievicz<br />

was rebellious, <strong>the</strong>n she was not like most women, who<br />

were not involved in political life and remained at home.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, Markievicz succeeded in participating in politics<br />

and escaping or avoiding domesticity.<br />

In (A), it doesn't make sense <strong>for</strong> someone to succeed in<br />

obtaining politics, and Markievicz certainly didn't succumb<br />

to domesticity. In (B), if Markievicz rebelled against <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that women were not involved in political life, <strong>the</strong>n<br />

she must have participated in, not escaped, politics.<br />

Choice (C) matches your prediction. Choice (D) is<br />

exactly opposite to your prediction-Markievicz would<br />

have pursued, not ignored, politics, and avoided, not<br />

observed, domesticity. Choice (E) is also opposite to your<br />

prediction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!