16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 Practice <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SAT</strong><br />

Practice Test Ten Answers and Explanations I<br />

919<br />

altered, falsified, or fake <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> blank. Spurious means false<br />

or lacking au<strong>the</strong>nticity, so it's a good match.<br />

4. D<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> kids won, <strong>the</strong>ir parents must have been pretty<br />

happy, and <strong>the</strong> reaction was probably joyous. Choice (D)<br />

fits both blanks well. The parents wouldn't be perplexed that<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir children won (unless <strong>the</strong>y thought <strong>the</strong> team was really<br />

lousy!). They wouldn't be enraged or dejected (depressed)<br />

at <strong>the</strong> team's victory. And <strong>the</strong>ir reaction wouldn't be<br />

scornful, or negative.<br />

5. B<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

You don't have to know that Genghis Khan was a violent<br />

dictator to get this question right. What's important to know<br />

is that <strong>the</strong> first word of <strong>the</strong> sentence, Although, implies that<br />

<strong>the</strong> two blanks have to contain words that contrast with each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r. Choice (B) is <strong>the</strong> best choice-although historians<br />

had thought that Genghis Khan was a despotic potentate,<br />

new research shows that many of his subjects never<strong>the</strong>less<br />

revered him. Although (A), tyrannical, is synonymous with<br />

despotic, (A)'s second-blank choice, abhorred, doesn't<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> predicted contrast. Choice (C), venerated,<br />

doesn't contrast with redundant. In (D), esteemed is similar<br />

to revered, but jocular Goking) does not provide a contrast.<br />

And in (E), it doesn't make sense to say that Khan's subjects<br />

invoked him despite his peremptory reputation.<br />

6. B<br />

Difficulty: High<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> sentence deals with advocates of free speech,<br />

you can predict that <strong>the</strong>y want to protect <strong>the</strong> right to express<br />

opinions. So a good prediction <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> first blank would<br />

be guarantee. What would <strong>the</strong>y feel about citizens who<br />

express unpopular sentiments? They would want <strong>the</strong>se<br />

citizens to have <strong>the</strong> right to speak freely, so <strong>the</strong>y wouldn't<br />

want <strong>the</strong>m to be censored. The advocates would not want<br />

to diminish freedom. Choice (B) fits best. In (A), it doesn't<br />

make sense to say that a person is divulged, or revealed.<br />

You could say that his or her name is divulged, but that's<br />

not what appears in <strong>the</strong> sentence. Restricted works pretty<br />

well <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> second blank, but it doesn't make sense to<br />

say that not restricting people will elucidate, or explain,<br />

freedom. And it doesn't make sense to say that freedom is<br />

embellished, or decorated.<br />

Questions 7-19<br />

Passage 1<br />

This is a very challenging passage. Because it was written<br />

a long time ago, <strong>the</strong> style is old-fashioned and a lot of <strong>the</strong><br />

vocabulary is difficult. Remember, though, that you don't<br />

need to understand every word to do well on <strong>the</strong> questions<br />

<strong>for</strong> a passage. In fact, you can often skip an entire sentence<br />

and still do just fine.<br />

In paragraph 1, <strong>the</strong> author indicates that he's not at all<br />

fond of Moby Dick. He says that it seems like Melville is<br />

testing <strong>the</strong> reader's patience and that this book is more<br />

exaggerated and dull than Melville's previous works.<br />

Paragraph 2 notes that <strong>the</strong> book is a strange blend of story<br />

and fact, and <strong>the</strong> writer feels that <strong>the</strong> book doesn't work as<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r. In paragraph 3, <strong>the</strong> author writes that <strong>the</strong> first couple<br />

of Melville's books were okay, but in his subsequent works,<br />

he has gone downhill. Melville should have stopped while<br />

he was ahead, but he ruined his reputation with Moby Dick.<br />

Passage 2<br />

This passage is modern and a little easier to handle.<br />

Paragraph 1 cites <strong>the</strong> opinions of critics (like author 1) who<br />

feel that Moby Dick has too much in<strong>for</strong>mation unrelated<br />

to <strong>the</strong> plot. Author 2 disagrees, and <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> passage<br />

describes why. Paragraph 2 notes that Melville needed<br />

<strong>the</strong> reader to consider <strong>the</strong> whale to be a worthy rival <strong>for</strong><br />

Ahab. This was a challenge, since <strong>the</strong> whale can't speak. In<br />

paragraph 3, <strong>the</strong> author notes that Melville chose to educate<br />

<strong>the</strong> reader in order to illuminate <strong>the</strong> character of <strong>the</strong> whale.<br />

Consequently, <strong>the</strong> book has lots of in<strong>for</strong>mation about whales<br />

and <strong>the</strong> sea. Paragraph 4 notes that <strong>the</strong>re is also plenty<br />

of in<strong>for</strong>mation about <strong>the</strong> process of whaling-hunting and<br />

killing whales. The author feels that this in<strong>for</strong>mation gives <strong>the</strong><br />

reader a better picture of Ahab's obsession.<br />

7. A<br />

Difficulty: High<br />

Be careful with questions that ask about a term or phrase<br />

that <strong>the</strong> author uses sarcastically. This appears in <strong>the</strong> first<br />

paragraph, where Author 1 states that each of Melville's<br />

works has gotten worse. They have advanced only in<br />

negative qualities such as vanity and being clumsy and<br />

ineffective. So, <strong>the</strong> author is using <strong>the</strong> term sarcastically.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!