10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

It is a debated topic whether forming healthy relationships is primarily dependent on fulfilling one’s<br />

own identity among developmental psychologists. For instance, according to Erikson (1968) people could form<br />

close relationships only after solving their own crisis. Intimacy is a relationship between trust based on<br />

acceptance of uniqueness and differences and emotions (Kan and Cares, 2006, cited in., Eryılmaz and Ercan,<br />

2011).<br />

Erikson’s developmental theory is the first place to see this phenomenon. According to Erikson, there<br />

are eight critical period in a person’s life. In each period, there is a crisis and conflict to be solved. Erikson stated<br />

that conflicts faced during developmental periods are not a disaster. Instead, it is a critical turning point to fulfill<br />

one’s potential. People could develop healthy personality to the extend s/he cope with these conflicts. In this<br />

way, a person could be equipped with tools to coper with the conflict s/he will face during the later<br />

developmental periods (Özdemir, Özdemir, Kadak, and Nasıroğlu, 2012). Young people that is the focus of the<br />

current study should have a steady identity sense in order to feel that s/he is ready to adulthood period. Hence, it<br />

is a important problem for a young people not to have sense of steady identity especially just before passing to<br />

the adulthood period and disrupt their harmony at some circumstances (Dereboy and Dereboy,1997 cited in<br />

Arslan and Arı, 2008).<br />

Marcia added the fact that whether a person have crisis or not as a parameter to Erikson’s theory<br />

proposed identity status concept and defined identity statuses and defined those statuses bade on availability of<br />

the dimensions of commitment and exploration. In other words, for Marcia, exploration of identity is ended with<br />

a status and there could be transitions between statuses. Marcia stated that foreclosure, identity diffusion,<br />

moratorium and identity achievement are the identity statuses (Atak, 2011).<br />

Arnett (2000), like Erikson, studied identity exploration but, unlike Erikson, stated that identity<br />

exploration process is not end up during adolescence period. An adolescent conduct experimentations in the<br />

areas of vocation, love and world views. Those experimentations become intense during emerging adulthood<br />

period (cited in Atak, 2011).<br />

During emerging adulthood period, five basic psychological of identity was proposed (Adams and<br />

Marshall, 1996, pp. 433; Serafini and Adams, 2002): (i) to present a structure enabling a person to understand<br />

who s/he is: Identity enable person to be aware of his/her autonomy and uniqueness. This awareness further<br />

present a structure enabling a person to be self-confident and having self-respect. (ii) to present meaning and<br />

direction sense with various connections, values and goals: identity is to provide a base where a person could<br />

direct or control his/her behaviors. (iii) to present sense of personal control: identity is to present a sense of an<br />

ability to express yourself independently, free will, and sense autonomy. (iv) to present a sense of consistency,<br />

continuity and harmony between values, beliefs and ideas. Identity is to present harmony ability and ability to<br />

have synthesis about yourself in a period of time. (v) To present an awareness about the probabilities and<br />

alternatives related to the future: Identity provides a future directedness which give opportunity for fulfilling<br />

your own potential (cited in Demir, 2011a).<br />

Studies of identity functions conducted in Turkey is very limited Demir (2011b) conducted a study with<br />

253 graduate students which showed that structure, goal, future, harmony and control sub-dimensions of identity<br />

functions have a predictive power over life satisfaction and explain %28 of it. It was found that there is a<br />

relationship between future relatedness and coping styles of active planning, seeking outside support. Another<br />

relationship was found between personal control and active planning, sheltering to religion and acceptance<br />

(Önen, 2012).<br />

Majority of recent publications generally focused on Marcia’s Kimlik Statuses Årseth, Kroger,<br />

Martinussen and Marcia (2009) conducted a meta-analysis with 550 empirical study published between 1966 and<br />

2005. The findings of the empirical studies conducted in Turkey are as follows;<br />

Atak, Kapçı and Çok (2013) who proposed that studies related to identity should focus on emerging<br />

adulthood instead of adolescence, conducted a study with 700 young people between the ages of 19-26. The<br />

focus of the study was individuation types and identity statuses. In the study, it was found that people in<br />

developmental individuation group had more healthy identity forming in comparison to people in standard<br />

individuation group. On the other hand, Ego statuses were found in close relationship with family attitudes. It<br />

was found that authoritarian and permissive family attitudes, in comparison to neglecting attitudes, were more<br />

related to identity foreclosure (Cakir and Aydin, 2005). Similarly, Eryılmaz and Aypay (2011) found that there is<br />

a strong relationship between subjective well-being and identity achievement and foreclosure identity statuses.<br />

Bacanlı (2011) found that there is a positive relationship identity achievement and rational decision<br />

making style, and negative relationship with dependent and undecided styles. Additionally, he further found that<br />

ego statuses are in close relationship with impulsive and undecided styles.<br />

The problems related to interpersonal relationships which is the other variable in the current study, has<br />

an effect in many field in life. This fact is already proven by many researches. For instance, Durak-Batıgün and<br />

Atay-Kayı (<strong>2014</strong>) avoidance, anger and manipulative sub-dimensions of “Interpersonal Style Scale” were found<br />

to have predictive power over impatient approach, unplanned approach and evaluative approach sub-dimensions<br />

of “Problem Solving Inventory”.<br />

1067

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!