10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

Personal growth and<br />

Professional development<br />

As a whole<br />

Total 26.63 142<br />

Between Groups 0.09 2<br />

Within Groups 20.60 140<br />

Total<br />

20.69 142<br />

Between Groups<br />

Within Groups<br />

Total<br />

0.05<br />

13.65<br />

13.70<br />

2<br />

140<br />

142<br />

0.05<br />

0.15 0.34 0.72<br />

0.03<br />

0.10 0.26 0.77<br />

Not<br />

Significant<br />

Not<br />

Significant<br />

4. No significant relationships were found between the Student-<strong>Teacher</strong>s’ competency on social<br />

regard for learning, learning environment, diversity of learners, curriculum, planning, assessing<br />

and reporting, community linkages and personal growth and professional development and in their<br />

profiles such as age, gender, socio-economic status and aptitude (see Tables 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,<br />

and 14).<br />

Table 8. Significant relationship between competency in terms of social regard for learning and the identified variables in the profile of the<br />

student-teachers<br />

Variables correlated N r p Interpretation<br />

Social regard for learning and gender 127 -0.03 0.77 Not Significant<br />

Social regard for learning and Age 127 -0.09 0.31 Not Significant<br />

Social regard for learning and socio-economic status 127 0.09 0.32 Not significant<br />

Social regard for learning and aptitude 127 -0.07 0.45 Not Significant<br />

Table 9. Significant relationship between competency in terms of learning environment and the identified variables in the profile of the<br />

student-teachers<br />

Variables correlated N r p Interpretation<br />

Learning environment and gender 127 -0.07 0.43 Not Significant<br />

Learning environment and Age 127 -0.13 0.14 Not Significant<br />

Learning environment and socio-economic status 127 0.13 0.15 Not significant<br />

Learning environment and aptitude 127 0.02 0.85 Not Significant<br />

Table 10. Significant relationship between competency in terms of diversity of learning and the identified variables in the profile of the<br />

student-teachers<br />

Variables correlated N r p Interpretation<br />

Diversity of learning and gender 127 -0.01 0.93 Not Significant<br />

Diversity of Learning and Age 127 -0.14 0.12 Not Significant<br />

Diversity of Learning and socio-economic status 127 0.12 0.17 Not significant<br />

Diversity of Learning and aptitude 127 -0.07 0.47 Not Significant<br />

Table 11. Significant relationship between competency in terms of curriculum and the identified variables in the profile of the studentteachers<br />

Variables correlated N r p Interpretation<br />

Curriculum and gender 127 -0.05 0.59 Not Significant<br />

Curriculum and Age 127 -0.07 0.46 Not Significant<br />

Curriculum and socio-economic status 127 0.14 0.11 Not significant<br />

Curriculum and aptitude 127 -0.06 0.48 Not Significant<br />

Table 12. Significant relationship between competency in terms of planning, assessing and reporting and the identified variables in the<br />

profile of the student-teachers<br />

Variables correlated N r p Interpretation<br />

Planning, assessing and reporting and gender 127 -0.12 0.19 Not Significant<br />

Planning, assessing and reporting and Age 127 -0.01 0.92 Not Significant<br />

Planning, assessing and reporting and socio-economic status 127 0.11 0.24 Not significant<br />

Planning, assessing and reporting and aptitude 127 -0.08 0.37 Not Significant<br />

835

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!