10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

Gilbert's & Boulter's typology, what type of models are you able to use at teaching? How long do you teach<br />

Chemistry? How long did you finish your graduation? Why do you teach Optical Isomery during Chemical<br />

lessons? Does your approach include any characteristics, besides those presented in the used didactic book? In<br />

affirmative case, which are those characteristics? How do you approach Optical Isomery concept? In your<br />

opinion, models shall be used to explain the Optical Isomery concept? Please justify your answer. Do you<br />

think concrete-mixed models can improve the comprehension of the Optical Isomery concept? Justify.<br />

What is the importance of teaching Optical Isomery to students, in your opinion? The bold questions above<br />

where repeated during the Posterior Questionnaire Application.<br />

RESULTS<br />

The results presented at this section were based on the materials and methodology previously presented and<br />

discussed, that means: concrete-mixed models; explaining model typology and Optical Isomery folder; besides<br />

the Previous and Posterior questionnaires, developed by the author of this research.<br />

Besides that, data collected through the abovementioned questionnaires have permitted descriptive analysis<br />

development, which is going to be discussed at this section. It is important to explain that all the produced<br />

graphics were projected through Excel 2007 software (Microsoft ® ).<br />

So, in face of the abovementioned explanations, the questionnaire application occurred on the period<br />

comprehended between August 13 th and September 27 th , during an informal personal encounter with selected<br />

Brazilian Chemical high school teachers of public and private schools of Distrito Federal,.<br />

However, independently of the way applications were done, it is important to clarify that all the applications<br />

were done in five (5) distinct moments, always following the application order below:<br />

1. Previous Questionnaire Application;<br />

2. Previous Questionnaire Collection;<br />

3. Explaining Model Typology and Optical Isomery Folder Application* - the author has delivered it to the<br />

teachers participant of this research, suggesting that they read the information presentes there in a dynamic<br />

way. To participants who demonstrated excessive worries about available time, it was suggested that they<br />

read it on another occasion, after filling and delivering of the Previous Questionnaire to the researcher.<br />

!!<br />

* At the end of the interview, the used orientation instruments were offered, totally free, to the individuals<br />

who participated on this research;<br />

!<br />

1. Posterior Questionnaire Application;<br />

2. Posterior Questionnaire Collection.<br />

!<br />

A group of ten (10) previous and posterior questionnaires were in all satisfactorily applied and analyzed.<br />

During the questionnaires application interval, an explaining model typology and Optical Isomery folder were<br />

offered, as a courtesy, to the target public of this intervention (see Appendix section).<br />

In the following pages the author has projected some graphics, which represent the results extracted from the<br />

applied questionnaires. Those visual models represent, respectively, Public and Private Teaching Net, <strong>Teacher</strong>s'<br />

Distribution along the high school series, High school taught contents, and Classroom work time, graduation-end<br />

time and age (years) for High School teachers.<br />

349

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!