10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

Transformation from <strong>Teacher</strong>-Centered To Subject-Centered Mathematics<br />

<strong>Education</strong><br />

Mehmet Türegün ª *<br />

ª Barry University<br />

Abstract<br />

Collective learning and multiplying understandings are some of the phenomena which my students and I have<br />

experienced in a mathematics classroom a few semesters back. In this paper, I will attempt to ground these<br />

classroom experiences in the complexity theory of teaching and learning as outlined by Davis & Sumara (2007),<br />

and try to describe how the complexity theory of teaching and learning, in turn, informed my classroom<br />

practices. I will also outline some alternative ideas based on a post-modern perspective with several focus points<br />

on the concepts of connectedness, non-linearity, holarchy, and creating spaces for an inclusive community of<br />

learners.<br />

Keywords.<br />

Introduction<br />

The perpetual fear of the unknown and uncertainty, and the comfort of the known and familiar certainty<br />

combined together create the basis for the Western obsession with control, which is aimed at eliminating<br />

uncertainty (Quinn, 1995). Tentacles of this obsession with control pervade at many levels and in a number of<br />

aspects of our society. Needless to say, this obsession with control dominates our educational system and tightly<br />

grasps our classrooms as well. Most teachers, in general, are very reluctant and afraid of letting go of control in<br />

their classrooms. <strong>Teacher</strong> identities and desire for control in classrooms are often tied in together. According to<br />

Scott (2008), three broad categories are proposed for teacher identities. These proposed teacher identities can be<br />

outlined as retrospective, with strong classification and framing tendencies; prospective, with strong concerns<br />

for efficiency, and decentered identities, with either instrumental or therapeutic tendencies. Decentered teachers<br />

identities situate teachers in principled discourses about the purpose of education, and are inclusive in nature<br />

(Scott, 2008). A decentered teacher identity is one of the facets of the notion of control in a classroom<br />

environment.<br />

The power to control or to have a control in a classroom environment or a classroom community can be<br />

perceived as having some security or feeling more secure in the classroom. However, the idea of controlling a<br />

classroom community tightly, in turn, creates an apparent dualistic distinction between the controller, the<br />

teacher, and the controlled, the student. As a possible result of this dualistic distinction, and rigid boundaries<br />

between the students and the teachers in a classroom created by our desire to have control, several issues and<br />

concerns including, but not limited to, mutual trust, respect, cooperation, and creativity might emerge, and<br />

negatively affect the growth of the students and the teacher, individually and the group, collectively.<br />

My own narrative in terms of how I was to teach a calculus course is, in essence, somewhat similar to, but yet<br />

based on a deeper and more personal dilemma than that of the narratives described by Meier & Rishel (1998),<br />

who express their narratives for having a desire to “do something different” regarding teaching their calculus<br />

course. I suspect my narrative can be traced back to a bifurcation point in my teaching limit cycle of “doing the<br />

same.” According to the systems theory, when or how a bifurcation point occurs cannot be precisely predicted.<br />

When small changes are fed back into a complex, non-linear system at some point the interruption of a limit<br />

cycle and subsequent bifurcation point(s) occur. I suspect that as a result of personal reflections on my studies of<br />

systems theory, several feedback loops have been forming in terms of my teaching practices. I felt strongly, in<br />

the sense of Palmer’s (2007) notion of “divided no more”, about changing how I was teaching calculus and<br />

transform the classroom environment of which my students and I were to be a part. My personal need and the<br />

subsequent decision to live “divided no more” are centered on the concept of theory informing practice, not on<br />

the intent of assaulting or criticizing my colleagues, whom I happen to notice, when walking in the hallways,<br />

engaged in transmitting information in lecture-and-listen classroom settings. But it is rather an observation of, at<br />

E-mail address: mturegun@barry.edu<br />

247

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!