10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

40<br />

35<br />

Frequency- definite article<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

1st recording<br />

2nd recording<br />

3rd recording<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

School 1 School 2 School 3 School 4 School 5<br />

Figure 2: The frequency of definite article use in the classroom interaction<br />

As seen above there are some classes (schools) and recordings (first recordings in all classes, but 2nd) where<br />

definite article is not used at all. In comparison to the indefinite article use we conclude that learners use more<br />

indefinite than definite article in their utterances. That is due to the fact that the pupils in early EFLL are first<br />

introduced to the indefinite article (as the results in this study confirmed) and to the definite article in the later<br />

phases of learning. So, the data analysis showed more frequent proper use of indefinite than definite article.<br />

This can be also explained with more frequent exposure to the former in the classroom context. These data<br />

confirm our first and second hypotheses.<br />

The qualitative analysis also showed the correct use of indefinite article in front of familiar nouns. Learners<br />

tend to omit indefinite article in front of unfamiliar nouns. We conclude that there is interdependence of lexis<br />

and grammar especially at the beginning of EFLL. It confirms our third hypothesis. There is also omission of<br />

the ‘an’ form of indefinite article due to very few familiar nouns with vowel beginnings and for young learners a<br />

difficult form for pronunciation. The same could be stated for the pronunciation of definite article as well. The<br />

qualitative analysis also showed omission of the indefinite article at the beginning of the sentence and correct<br />

use of the definite article in the same sentence (e.g. *pencil is on the box, confirmed also in Trenkić 2002, Jarvis<br />

2002).<br />

Conclusion<br />

The findings demonstrate the problem that Croatian learners of English have in mastering the English articles.<br />

The analysis revealed that frequent exposure to both types of articles and frequent repetition of structures<br />

including them, increases the correct use of both definite and indefinite articles. However, inconsistency in the<br />

use of both types of articles indicates a long and fluctuating process of their acquisition. The analysis also<br />

revealed tendency to omit the articles, especially at the beginning stages of learning, probably due to the nonexistence<br />

of the articles in the participants L1 (Croatian). We finally conclude that there is a need of developing<br />

learners’ awareness of the existence of the article in English and their semantic and pragmatic role. The study<br />

supports the Fluctuation Hypothesis, i.e. students who lack articles in L1, fluctuate between definite and<br />

indefinite article use over an extended time period.<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!