10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

Aim of the Study<br />

The main aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between ego-identity functions and<br />

interpersonal styles among Communication Faculty students in Marmara University. Additionally, it was further<br />

investigated whether or not ego-identity functions and interpersonal styles show difference by gender, age, field<br />

of study, kind of high school graduated, perceived economic status and order of birth.<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

Population and Sample<br />

The population of the study is students enrolled to Communication Faculty in Marmara University.<br />

Sample of the study is composed of 220 students selected based on cluster sampling from the population. The<br />

demographical information related to the sample was given in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Distribution of the Sample by Gender<br />

Gender f %<br />

Male 108 49,1<br />

Female 112 50,9<br />

Total 220 100,0<br />

As the distribution of the participants by gender is examined, it is seen that number of male (n=108;<br />

%409,1) and female (n=112,, %50,9) participants are very close to each other (see Table 1). Additionally, it is<br />

observed that, participants are mostly at the ages between 21-23 (n=118, %53.6), the number of students at 1 st<br />

and 2 nd years of study is very similar to number of student at 3 rd and 4 th years of study (%55.9 and %40.9<br />

respectively). The distribution of students by the field of study are as follows: Journalism (%31.4), Public<br />

Relations and Publicity (%27.3), Radio, Television and Cinema (%41.4). Most of the participants were<br />

graduated from general high school (%57.3). <strong>Education</strong> of their parents is mostly found to be at primary and<br />

secondary school levels (%45 and %28.6 for mothers, %51.8 and %25 for fathers respectively). Majority of<br />

students (%62.7) perceive their economic status as middle class while %42.3 of them are the first child of their<br />

parent.<br />

Data Collection Tools<br />

Ego Functions Scale (EFS): The original form of the scale was developed by Serafini and colleagues and the<br />

scale was adapted to the Turkish culture by Demir (2011a) The scale is based on Erikson’s theory and composed<br />

of 15 items and 5 sub-dimensions (structure, harmony, goals, future and control). It is a self-report inventory and<br />

it is composed of Likert type questions with 5 options. The factor analysis confirmed that Turkish version of the<br />

scale is composed of five factors like the original scale. For instance, the content validity of the scale was proved<br />

with the ones that are theoretically parallel. .The reliability of Turkish version of the scale was investigated with<br />

the results of internal consistency coefficients, test-retest reliability and item-total correlations.<br />

Interpersonal Styles Scale (ISS): The scale was developed by Şahin et al (2009) and composed of 60 items<br />

Likert type items. For each item 5 options are available. The scale aims to determine interpersonal relationship<br />

styles. Higher scores earned in the scale means lower level of quality in each dimensions. The scale is composed<br />

of six dimensions: dominant style, avoidant style, angry style, insensitive style, manipulative style and cynical<br />

style. The scale was found as reliable and valid based on the investigations by Şahin and his colleagues.<br />

Analysis<br />

The analysis of the data was performed by using SPSS 15 statistical analysis software. During the analysis,<br />

demographical information of the participants was described by using frequencies and percentages. The<br />

relationships between the sub-dimensions of EFS and ISS were determined by calculating Pearson correlations.<br />

In order to determine whether or not EFS and ISS subscale scores show difference by gender of the participants,<br />

independent sample of T test analysis were performed. For other demographical variables, One Way Analysis of<br />

Variance (ANOVA) was used for each sub dimension.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Table 2. Means and Standard Deviations of EFS sub-scale Scores<br />

EFS Sub-dimensions x ss<br />

Structure 11,77 2,61<br />

Harmony 11,90 2,45<br />

Goals 12,30 2,51<br />

Future 11,00 2,49<br />

Control 12,31 2,30<br />

1068

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!