International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

International Teacher Education Conference 2014
Learning, 23(3), 218-232.
Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative analysis: Practice and innovation. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Feldman, M. S. (1994). Strategies for interpreting qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications,
Inc.
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts,
procedures and measure to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112.
Hallford, A. (2012). Transforming a Traditional School Counseling Graduate Program to Distance Learning: the
Student Experience. Retrieved from http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.edu.20120203.06.html#Ref
Hsieh, C., Luo, W., & Breed, J. B. A Study of Interaction in Chinese-language Cross-Cultural Classes via Long
Distance Synchronous Videoconferencing. Retrieved from
http://web.ntnu.edu.tw/~clhsieh/2_Research/2.1_Publication/C21_2010.09_APTEL.pdf
Hoven, D. (2006). Designing for disruption: Remodelling a blended course in technology in (language) teacher
education. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in
Tertiary Education “Who’s Learning? Whose Technology? (pp. 339-349). Sydney: Sydney University Press.
Hui, W., Hu, P.J.H., Clark, T., Tam, K., & Milton, J. (2008). Technology-assisted learning: a longitudinal field
study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 24(3), 245-259.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English For Specific Purposes: A learning -centred approach. Cambridge.
CUP.
Lee, L. (2004a). Native and nonnative speakers’ perceptions of networked collaborative interaction: A
sociocultural approach. In L. Lomicka & J. Cooke-Plagwitz (Eds.), Technology and the language teacher: The
theoretical, historical, and practical interface (pp. 248-261). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Lee, L. (2004b). Learners’ perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish
in the US. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Kember, D. (1989). A longitudinal process model of dropout from distance education. Journal of Higher
Education, 60(3), 278-301.
Long, M. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia
(Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
Motamedi, V. (2001). A critical look at the use of videoconferencing in United States distance education.
Education, 122(2), 386-394.
O’Dowd, R. (2005). Negotiating sociocultural and institutional contexts: The case of Spanish American
telecollaboration. Language and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 40-56.
Phillips, N., & Hardy, C. (2002). Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social construction. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning &
Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through
telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 190-205.
653