10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

Acquisition of English Articles by Croatian Primary School Students in Early<br />

EFLL<br />

Katica Balenovic a *<br />

ª University of Zadar , Croatia<br />

Abstract<br />

The paper deals with the analysis of the transcribed recordings of spontaneous classroom interaction in five<br />

classes of primary school students in early EFLL in Croatia. The study was conducted within the framework of a<br />

large research project supported by the Croatian Ministry of Science, <strong>Education</strong> and Sport. The students<br />

involved in this study started learning English at the very beginning of their education. The recordings were<br />

taken during three consecutive years when the students were at the end of grade one, two and three. Although<br />

the students overall language development showed clear progress, the development of the correct use of definite<br />

and indefinite article remained a very variable one. There is progress in the sense that throughout the years the<br />

use of both types of article increases, but the incorrect usage is still very frequent. The study showed a clear<br />

interdependence between lexis and grammar at the very beginning of EFLL (learning English as a foreign<br />

language).<br />

Keywords.<br />

Introduction<br />

L2 learners of English often have difficulty in mastering the proper use of indefinite and definite articles<br />

especially when their L1 lacks articles ( Lightbown& Spada, 2006 ). Most of the work on the acquisition of the<br />

English articles focused on adult students/learners ( Trenkić 2002, 2008, Zergollern-Miletić 2008). There's been<br />

no previous longitudinal research on the acquisition of the English articles by the Croatian primary school<br />

students, so there's been a need to examine this process. We wanted to explore the development of the<br />

interlanguage ( Selinker, 1972) of primary school students over the period of three successive years to the<br />

special emphasis on the acquisition of the English definite and indefinite articles.<br />

Background<br />

In this part, we will briefly discuss the term interlanguage, since at the very beginning of learning any foreign<br />

language students in their oral production are likely to use their mother tongue more that the target language.<br />

The semantics of definitiness/indefinitiness will be discussed as well and the previous research of articles in L2<br />

acquisition (Ionin, Zergollern-Miletić, Trenkić).<br />

Interlanguage<br />

The term interlanguage was first introduced into the study of SLA by Larry Selinker (1972, 1992), to describe<br />

a language between two systems that exists and develops from L1 trying to approach the target language (TL).<br />

Since this term describes the language with the elements of both languages, sometimes it is called compromise<br />

system (Filipović, 1972). The main characteristics of this notion are seen through its simplification, variability,<br />

dynamism and especially crosslinguistic influence, or language transfer (Jarvis&Pavlenko, 2008), where we<br />

mostly deal with positive and negative language transfer. But, language transfer can occur not only from L1 to<br />

an L2 (forward transfer) but also vice versa, i.e. from L2 to an L1 (backward or reverse transfer) or even from<br />

L2 to an L3 (lateral transfer). In this sense of language transfer or crosslinguistic influence there is also<br />

bidirectional transfer (Medved Krajnović, 2010) i.e. interaction of two languages known by the learner.<br />

Crucial components of the language acquisition process include input, intake, output and feedback. Input<br />

refers to what is available to the learner in the learning process, while intake refers to what is actually “taken in”<br />

by the learner. Feedback provides learners the information about their utterances and gives chances to focus on<br />

E-mail address: balenovick@net.hr<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!