10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

A Way of Not Seeing: Reflections on Paradigms in <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Andrew Effrat a *<br />

ª Simmons College, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong> education has increasingly been blamed for the shortcomings of the educational system in the United<br />

States. This paper suggests that the dominant paradigm in teaching and teacher education which rests primarily<br />

on psychological foundations may be a factor underlying some of the problems. This more individualistic and<br />

psychological paradigm is reflected in conceptions of the learner, approaches to assessment, the structure of<br />

rewards, classroom management, accreditation guidelines, etc. Since a way of seeing is also a way of not seeing,<br />

it is suggested that a paradigm resting on a more sociological perspective may offer useful complementary<br />

strategies that would enable teachers to be more adept at treating schools and classrooms as learning<br />

communities with all the facets and group dynamics of any social system. In effect, this paper suggests that<br />

teachers may benefit from being prepared as applied sociologists as much as they are as applied psychologists.<br />

Keywords.<br />

SECTION I - INTRODUCTORY REMARKS<br />

The theme of this conference, teacher education, concerns a matter of central significance in our educational<br />

systems. <strong>Teacher</strong> education plays a crucial role in recruiting, screening and preparing the next generation of<br />

teachers and is central to building the capacity of educational systems to address the needs of its students and<br />

families. Regrettably, I am cautiously pessimistic about the current prospects of teacher education. For one<br />

thing, teacher education seems to have lost credibility in the larger policy community and to have become an<br />

easy target to blame for so many problems such as for teacher dropouts, for the poor performance of teachers,<br />

for the poor performance of students, for not closing the achievement gap, for the decline in public support for<br />

schools, and so on, to the point that many in the U.S. question whether there is really a need for formal or<br />

extensive teacher education and certification.<br />

Indeed, there are various movements in the U.S. that are experiencing growing popularity, such as charter<br />

schools and Teach for America, that can be seen as challenges to the future of teacher certification and<br />

education, especially as it is currently linked to universities. Perhaps it is more important than ever for those of<br />

us who believe in the need for truly qualified teachers and high quality teacher education to reflect on how we<br />

might improve and be seen to improve what we are doing in teacher education.<br />

It has been suggested that a way of seeing is also a way of not seeing. This presentation is not intended to<br />

present original research; it is not intended to present proofs or conclusions; it is not meant as a critique or<br />

attack. Instead, it is intended as a reflection concerning some aspects and data concerning teachers and teacher<br />

education. It is intended rather as an invitation to look at things in a different light, to offer another way of<br />

seeing.<br />

SECTION II - TEACHER DROPOUTS IN THE U.S.: RATES AND REASONS<br />

In the U.S., in the first 3-5 years of teaching, a large percentage of new teachers leave teaching. Some studies<br />

suggest that as high as 50% of new teachers quit the profession in their first 5 years. Similar results have been<br />

reported for comparable professions such as social work and nursing. However, I do not think that this<br />

decreases the significance of this phenomenon concerning teachers. In fact, I suspect that there are similar<br />

underlying reasons for the high attrition rates of newer entries in these professions.<br />

No doubt, some would suggest that this is part of the natural sorting and selection process in a free market<br />

and that it should not be a matter of serious concern. However, the extent of teacher dropouts strikes me as<br />

disturbingly high and worth trying to understand better. What might it be indicative of?<br />

E-mail address: andrew.effrat@simmons.edu<br />

479

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!