10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

All students were tutored and interviewed by the researchers on two occasions, for between 50 and 60<br />

minutes. All the tutorials and interviews were recorded, with the permission of the subject students. After the<br />

tutorials and interviews, the recordings were transcribed by the researchers carefully to assure the respondents<br />

that they and the place of them would not be identifiable in any subsequent report. Once the final research report<br />

was written, the recordings of the tutorials and interviews were archived by the researchers.<br />

Data Analysis<br />

Inductive content analysis was implemented for this study. Data were systematically and thoroughly<br />

analyzed; all of the transcripts were read by the researchers and put into a table. The answers were coded in the<br />

style of a grounded theory approach to data analysis (Altheide, 1996; Atkinson, 1992; Ezzy, 2002; Feldman,<br />

1994; Phillips & Hardy, 2002) to label each condensed meaning and analyzed for words or phrases with the<br />

same meaning in order to categorize the responses under the same emerging themes. In other words, the answers<br />

were analyzed for words or phrases with the same meaning in order to determine meaning units. Codes were<br />

used to label each condensed meaning unit, and categories were grouped into patterns with the final<br />

development of themes (Graneheim & Lundman, 2004).<br />

The tutorial and interview texts were sorted into five areas; experiences of having lessons via synchronous<br />

videoconferencing in terms of technical, learning issues and teaching issues; and ideas related to improve this<br />

course and taking the following course via synchronous videoconferencing. The texts were read through several<br />

times to obtain a sense of the whole. Three theme headings related to technology, pedagogy, and administration,<br />

were generated from the data and all of the data that were coded took part under these themes. Two independent<br />

researchers were asked to verify the accuracy of the categorization and after that it was finalized.<br />

FINDINGS and DISCUSSION<br />

Three themes were identified at the end of the data analysis that reflects the participant’s reflections related to<br />

their synchronous videoconferencing experience: technology, pedagogy and administration.<br />

Technological Reflections<br />

Students’ expressed their experiences related to synchronous videoconferencing classroom as being a virtual<br />

classroom with communication quality in understanding, satisfaction, and communication breakdown. This was<br />

a consideration related to the overall communication quality between the instructor and participants’ location.<br />

But, as synchronous videoconferencing and face-to-face instruction are not exactly the same, there is always a<br />

room for new technological experiences for students that may go beyond what exists in traditional classroom<br />

settings.<br />

Communication<br />

There is no control of the students over tardiness and attendance when there are technical challenges.<br />

Students reflected that they had experienced almost no communication breakdowns during the lessons. One<br />

student reported, “I think it was a good experience; it was a little bit difficult at the beginning of the semester as<br />

it was not easy to follow the lesson because the connection was not so good. But after a while I think it was<br />

really nice to have lessons.”<br />

Quality<br />

Students all agreed on that the quality of the sound and tablet —an electronic screen showing the entire<br />

course related documents and the page the instructor was writing on while teaching— was good and had no<br />

problems in understanding the instructor. Students felt comfortable with watching the instructor and following<br />

the lesson on the screen via synchronous videoconferencing, as they were familiar with computers and<br />

technology from their educational background. They noted that this was not the first online course taken, but this<br />

experience was a better one compared to the videos that they had watched before in their previous courses in<br />

terms of understanding and satisfaction resulted from the mutual communication quality. They reported that the<br />

instructor’s voice and the image was high-quality. One student reported a problem with the clarity of the voices<br />

of the students in Istanbul and stated that the voices of the students in Istanbul were flat and what they said could<br />

not be heard exactly from Berlin, but the AV technicians fixed the problem.<br />

Improvement<br />

649

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!