10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

Enrolled Student Service: Tutoring Support Program as a Safety Net<br />

During the spring/summer partnership between ACW and international students at Bellevue College, students<br />

benefited from more individualized tutoring efforts. While this produced mixed results largely due to time<br />

management issues, it was an effective assessment of learning progress and also highlighted core differences<br />

between previous student success in their home countries as opposed to the different styles and expectations of<br />

the U.S. college classroom.<br />

First, students were paired with the instructor. ACW tutors and international students worked together to set<br />

up weekly contact times, negotiated based on the students’ schedules. Students were given tutor contact<br />

information before the start of their English 101 course. Alternately, ACW personnel collected student emails<br />

and Skype addresses so that ACW tutors could contact their students prior to the start of the English 101 course<br />

to introduce themselves and discuss with the students reciprocal expectations for the quarter.<br />

Interaction between the student and instructor followed a consistent schedule. For of each week of the<br />

quarter, tutors contacted students once per week, conducting a ‘check-in’: inquiring about current essays and<br />

upcoming writing assignments, inquiring about any difficulties focused on the elements of English 101 writing,<br />

and establishing a friendly, trust-based rapport with students.<br />

Once the tutor and student ‘met’ over email, the tutor sent the student a ‘get started questionnaire’, asking the<br />

student to provide a brief writing sample focused on what the student believed were his or her strengths and<br />

weaknesses when writing, and the student’s goals for their writing. This writing sample served as first<br />

assessment for the tutor. From this, the tutor and student outlined a plan of action for the quarter to meet the<br />

student’s goals and address problem areas. The plan was in writing and submitted to the ACW administrator. As<br />

the quarter moved forward, the plan was updated as needed and used to assess student progress at the 5 th week<br />

mark.<br />

By week 2, students were expected to have worked with their tutor on at least one piece of writing from their<br />

English 101 course. This ensured tutors actually annotated and diagnosed a student’s work early in the quarter to<br />

assess it for problem areas, to work on continuing difficulties in skill-building, and to use this first piece of<br />

writing as an assessment tool for progress benchmarks.<br />

Instructional Sessions<br />

Students received 45 minutes per week of focused time with their tutor, to work on issues identified for that<br />

week. Students and tutors negotiated how writing support sessions occur. Options included: email; Skype; phone<br />

contact. As an example, an ideal student/tutor contact looked like this:<br />

• Prior to as scheduled Skype session, a tutor reviewed a student’s essay and prepared his/her comments<br />

on diagnosed areas of improvement (for example, identifying and repairing run-on sentences).<br />

• Based on session diagnostics, a tutor prescribed ACW specialized support resources for the student,<br />

such as written practice modules and video vignettes that focus on problem areas and remedies. When<br />

ACW tutors reported that many students are struggling with the same problem area(s), ACW provided<br />

brief instructional webinars for student groups to access at the convenience of their schedules.<br />

• The student then contacted the tutor again, to discuss progress and remaining questions.<br />

Before, During, and After Each Program: Summative and Formative Assessment<br />

AWC created a standardized Writing Feedback Form that allowed tutors to streamline their work with<br />

students to diagnose problems areas in writing. The directive form identifies areas of student strengths (e.g.,<br />

comma usage) and areas needing improvement (e.g., articles usage). These forms accompanied all annotated<br />

drafts returned to students, and American College Writing administrators also received the feedback forms.<br />

717

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!