10.01.2016 Views

International Teacher Education Conference 2014 1

itec2014

itec2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Teacher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>2014</strong><br />

abbreviations and symbols instead. This study is concerned with speed because to be efficient readers and notetakers,<br />

students need to achieve their reading and note taking goals as quickly and easily as possible.<br />

RESEARCH QUESTIONS<br />

The current study is designed to answer two primary questions:<br />

$ What is the nature of the relationship between reading speed and note- taking speed? Are they totally<br />

independent or correlated variables?<br />

$ What are the habits that slow/ rapid readers and note- takers report on using when dealing with both skills?<br />

THE HYPOTHESIS<br />

We hypothesize that third year English Students to be slow readers and slow note takers. Thus, students’<br />

reading speed (or pace) and note –taking speed and habits correlate positively.<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

METHOD<br />

The investigation is conducted through a descriptive diagnostic methodology. It focuses, on the other hand,<br />

on another common type of research which is the correlational one. This latter is carried out to explore the nature<br />

of the relationship among variables a researcher is interested in (J. Charles Alderson, Caroline Claphan and<br />

Dianne Wall, 1995, p. 77). Hence, the current study is constructed following two steps: reading and note taking<br />

speeds tests correlation, and reading and note taking speeds questionnaires correlation.<br />

PARTICIPANTS<br />

Our study population is that of third year students preparing a license degree in English as a foreign language.<br />

The primary sample consisted of forty eight (n= 48) students. Their proficiency level was assessed through their<br />

performance on a test measuring reading speed and note taking speed. It is limited to this size for the sake of<br />

being time economist, practical and accurate. However, the secondary sample represents two hundred and sixty<br />

two (n= 262 university students majoring in English-language too). They are randomly selected from the target<br />

population. It is important to note that sex differences have not been given any predictions in the study.<br />

MATERIALS:<br />

Two tests were used in this study. The reading speed section of the test was used to measure participants’<br />

reading rates. Another test, which was the reading section of a note taking test, served as the note taking speed<br />

test.<br />

Through the reading speed and the note taking speed questionnaires, respondents are said to have gone<br />

through retrospective reporting. The rationale behind these questionnaires is to find out wealthy information<br />

about the students’ reading and note taking backgrounds, perceptions, speed and type of strategies mostly used<br />

by English students and which can act negatively or positively, either directly or indirectly on their reading and<br />

note taking speeds.<br />

PROCEDURES<br />

As a first step before administering the tests, students were given several instructions as regards the setting of<br />

the tests. They were reminded too to work independently and silently. The study was conducted over one<br />

Monday morning and the text was provided for each student. The instructor doesn’t read it for subjects of the<br />

test group. The reading passage is a narrative text containing 550 words long under the title “the missing<br />

painting”. It does not include technical words or any culture specific ideas. This aids foreign language readers in<br />

tackling the text and helps them in achieving comprehension and taking notes easily.<br />

Students in this investigation go through a timed reading task in which they read the passage for the first time<br />

at their casual, normal and comfortable speed but they have to note their starting and finishing reading times.<br />

After the first reading was over, in order to evaluate students’ note-taking speeds, they were required to read the<br />

passage for the second time and take notes, after which they had 15 minutes to finish and employ their usual<br />

370

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!