23.06.2013 Views

LE SYMPOSIUM INTERNATIONAL LE LIVRE. LA ROUMANIE. L ...

LE SYMPOSIUM INTERNATIONAL LE LIVRE. LA ROUMANIE. L ...

LE SYMPOSIUM INTERNATIONAL LE LIVRE. LA ROUMANIE. L ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mithradates’ foot soldiers at the Battle of chaeronea 381<br />

As these soldiers were expelled from their lightly fortified position,<br />

the main battle was about to be joined. Sulla had advanced from his camp<br />

towards Chaeronea, leaving the command of the rearguard to Murena.<br />

Archelaos crossed the Kephisos and launched his attack, forcing Sulla to<br />

turn around and face him. thus, his vanguard became the roman right wing<br />

and Murena’s rearguard became the roman left. hortensius and Galba<br />

were given command over the reserves on either side, which may imply<br />

that the roman line of battle on that day comprised not of three, but of two<br />

lines. on the pontic side, Archelaos took full advantage of his superiority in<br />

numbers and arranged his phalanx in the centre, with substantial contingents<br />

of cavalry and light infantry on the wings, whose purpose was to envelop the<br />

shorter roman line. In the beginning, things seem to go well for the pontic<br />

soldiers of the right wing, who, under Archelaos’ direct command, manage<br />

to put great pressure on hortensius’ detachment, forcing Sulla to come<br />

personally to his aid, diverting at the same time some troops from his own<br />

wing to help him. either following a premeditated plan or acting on the spur<br />

of the moment, Archelaos disengaged his cavalry, went behind his centre<br />

line and crossed the whole length of the field, attacking this time the roman<br />

right, which had just been abandoned by Sulla, its commander. however,<br />

even without their general, the romans held their own (possibly with the<br />

aid of reinforcements from Galba – on this detail plutarch remains silent),<br />

and when Sulla did return, they were thus emboldened that they managed to<br />

break the will of their attackers and chase them from the field. At much the<br />

same time, the phalanx in the centre gave way under the constant barrage<br />

of artillery, and the pontic right could no longer hold. the battle, which had<br />

started so well for the pontic army, ended in complete disaster.<br />

having completed the description of the battle, it is time to proceed<br />

with the analysis of the two main components of the pontic infantry, the<br />

lightly armed and the heavily armed, trying to discover as much as possible<br />

about their equipment, their origin and their traditions.<br />

3. Light infantry<br />

All ancient armies had contingents of lightly armed soldiers. During<br />

the Classical Age, for example, they were simply the poorest men in<br />

the community, those who did not possess the wealth to purchase more<br />

sophisticated weaponry, but by the time of the hellenistic era, they had<br />

become a professionalised corps in their own right, highly specialised and<br />

much appreciated for their mobility. In the context of the battle of Chaeronea,<br />

they were, for example, tasked with occupying this city for Archelaos.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!