23.06.2013 Views

LE SYMPOSIUM INTERNATIONAL LE LIVRE. LA ROUMANIE. L ...

LE SYMPOSIUM INTERNATIONAL LE LIVRE. LA ROUMANIE. L ...

LE SYMPOSIUM INTERNATIONAL LE LIVRE. LA ROUMANIE. L ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

614 KRISTA ZAcH<br />

used) differing by 24 o from the prime Greenwich degree (internationally<br />

in use since 1884). French geographers sometimes chose paris as the 0 o<br />

meridian; it differs by 27 o from hijero. 53 It seems that Cantemir’s estimated<br />

lengths were more accurate than theirs. 54<br />

3. Scholars also failed to analyse other – external – data the three<br />

Dutch and French single maps of Moldavia offer – such as emblematics,<br />

frames and title lines, cartouches and their imprints. It is well known that<br />

cartographers, by their own declaration 55 , did not change these additional<br />

embellishments at random. they had personal (e.g. hiding their sources) as<br />

well as commercial reasons in doing so. Imaginary or fancy coats of arms<br />

made maps look more attractive. 56 using an outstanding person’s name –<br />

as is the case of a ruling “prince” 57 – would draw special attention to the<br />

new product on the market.<br />

4. Guillaume Delisle and J.-B. d’Anville are known to mark the<br />

turning point towards a more scientific conception in mapping. they also<br />

are well known for using auxiliary data from reports of natural scientists,<br />

missionaries and other travellers to enrich the contents of their maps. 58<br />

Couldn’t Descriptio Moldaviae (circulating in manuscript copies) have<br />

been intended as a source for mapping Moldavia anew in the 1730ies,<br />

based on Cantemir’s text? – nobody has asked, or looked into this yet.<br />

5. And lastly, what exactly is meant by the term ‘to copy’ in Guillaume<br />

Delisle’s letter to Schumacher of 1721 (“des Cartes […] d’en avoir copié”) 59<br />

and d’Anville’s reference quoted above – “to integrally copy the Map” 60 ?<br />

today the meaning of this term is ambiguous, as will best be understood by<br />

studying map production as a historical process.<br />

53 Cantemir in Descriptio Moldaviae established the meridians for Moldavia at<br />

45 o ,39’to 53 o ,22’ (see the edition Bucharest 1973, 59); d’Anville positionned Moldavia<br />

between 47 o to 54 o (1737) and le rouge (1770) inbetween 43 o and 49 o , see maps in<br />

Appendix no. 1, 2, 4.<br />

54 According to the Greenwich meridian, Moldavia is at approx. 26 o to 30 o .<br />

55 See quote from Willem Blaeu’s preface of 1631 to Atlantis Appendi and Johannes<br />

Janssonius (1633) below.<br />

56 See the Amsterdam 1737 and the anonymous Frankfurt 1769/70 maps as good<br />

examples.<br />

57 MÜL<strong>LE</strong>R calls cantemir „der hohe Verfasser“ and „ehemaligen Fürsten und<br />

hospodar von der Moldau“, Vorrede 2, 25.<br />

58 BAGROW – SKELTON: Meister der Kartographie, 204 f.; HAR<strong>LE</strong>Y, J. B. –<br />

WOODWARD, D.: the Map and the Development of the history of Cartography. In: the<br />

history of Cartography. 2 vol. Chicago, london 1987–1998. Vol. 1, 9 f.<br />

59 See note 26 above.<br />

60 See note 11 above.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!