04.01.2015 Views

O Fututo do Constitucionalismo - Caderno de Resumos [2014][l]

O Fututo do Constitucionalismo - Caderno de Resumos [2014][l]

O Fututo do Constitucionalismo - Caderno de Resumos [2014][l]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

150 • I Congresso Internacional <strong>de</strong> Direito Constitucional e Filosofia Política<br />

interest. The problem is that a correct balancing between interests<br />

should count just the public interests because the personal interests<br />

inva<strong>de</strong> the ethical <strong>de</strong>cisions of the people.<br />

The second argument holds that the Greatest Happiness Principle<br />

<strong>do</strong>es not protect the citizens individually. In a situation of crises<br />

normally the minorities are in dangerous because the majority can<br />

produce political acts which prejudice their lives. So, the Greatest<br />

Happiness Principle can be used has a process to legitimate a political<br />

act against Jews or the black people, for example.<br />

One of the alternatives in political philosophy is the Egalitarianism.<br />

According to Ronald Dworkin, influenced by John Rawls, this<br />

theory separates the public and the private dimension of human being.<br />

This separation, nevertheless, is not so much strong, but wishes protect<br />

the rights of the citizens. The principal objective of this movement is to<br />

<strong>de</strong>fend the right of the people to <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong> about their own lives without<br />

the interference of the others, except with a serious justification based<br />

on rights, not in the well-being. So, in the Justice Holmes’s example,<br />

someone who shouts falsely fire in a crow<strong>de</strong>d theater can be stopped<br />

because the rights of the others limit such free<strong>do</strong>m of speech.<br />

The results of this political <strong>de</strong>bate in the justification of the free<strong>do</strong>m<br />

of speech are two important theories. The first one is the instrumental<br />

justification as a market of i<strong>de</strong>as. That theory was created by<br />

Stuart Mill and it is based on Utilitarianism. The principal element is<br />

the thesis that the free<strong>do</strong>m of speech is important because, as in the<br />

economic market, the best i<strong>de</strong>as will overcome the weaks in a free public<br />

<strong>de</strong>bate. In addition, that best i<strong>de</strong>as will be the used in the government<br />

of the community. The other element is that the market of i<strong>de</strong>as<br />

is important to the legitimacy of the political power because everyone<br />

could be part of the <strong>de</strong>bate about the principles used in the government.<br />

This theory can be used as justification of the free<strong>do</strong>m of press as<br />

in the Brazilian case of the statute of press in the ADPF 130.<br />

The other i<strong>de</strong>a is based on the Ronald Dworkin’s Egalitarianism<br />

and it <strong>de</strong>fends the rights as trumps. The right is a constitutive justification<br />

for the limits of the state. So, even a kind of discourse that the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!