04.01.2015 Views

O Fututo do Constitucionalismo - Caderno de Resumos [2014][l]

O Fututo do Constitucionalismo - Caderno de Resumos [2014][l]

O Fututo do Constitucionalismo - Caderno de Resumos [2014][l]

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Argumentos consequencialistas e argumentos extrajurídicos na jurisdição constitucional • 191<br />

tion. In the case of the economic argument the best alternative is<br />

not the one that is most used in the economic community, but the<br />

one that has a better match with the aims of the law. The reasoning<br />

used in antirust cases is a good example of a juridical option between<br />

conflicting economic arguments. We also need to focus on local coherency<br />

instead of global coherency. Although Maccormick’s proposition<br />

is groun<strong>de</strong>d on global coherency it is possible to find support<br />

in his writings for local coherency, mainly in his differences with<br />

Ronald Dworking 5 . Another issue is the use of incomplete theorized<br />

arguments as <strong>de</strong>veloped by Cass Sustein 6 , which can be applied not<br />

only to juridical arguments but also on extrajuridical ones. In this<br />

context it is possible to <strong>de</strong>sign a judicial reasoning that inclu<strong>de</strong>s consequentialist<br />

reasoning and extrajuridical arguments and maintain<br />

the control of the judicial activity with the three C’s from Maccomick’s<br />

theory (consequences, coherency and consistency requisites).<br />

In this framework we can conclu<strong>de</strong> that economic arguments<br />

can be inclu<strong>de</strong>d in judicial justification as a scientific ones and the<br />

judge must choose between the available scientific theories. This<br />

choice must be ma<strong>de</strong> with publicity, so the reason of choosing a certain<br />

scientific theory must be part of the process of giving reasons.<br />

In the perspective a substantive pattern of justification is necessary.<br />

The use of local coherency and incomplete theorized arguments provi<strong>de</strong><br />

a way of reducing complexity. This solution provi<strong>de</strong>s a mo<strong>de</strong>l of<br />

judicial reasoning capable of <strong>de</strong>aling with the challenge of bringing<br />

extrajuridical arguments in the judicial reasoning.<br />

References<br />

MACCORMICK, Neil. Rhetoric and The Rule of Law: a theory of legal<br />

reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.<br />

MACCORMICK, Neil; SUMMERS, Robert S. (ed). Interpreting Statutes:<br />

a comparative study. Ashgate: Dartmouth, 1991.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!