29.11.2012 Aufrufe

WAS TUT GUT? - Universiteit Twente

WAS TUT GUT? - Universiteit Twente

WAS TUT GUT? - Universiteit Twente

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

therefore become necessary to find new starting - points and to rephrase the medical<br />

- ethical discourse.<br />

In the search for alternative concepts the author encounters well - known,<br />

mainly American philosophers who represent, as opposed to the Kantian tradition, a<br />

more contextual approach of philosophy. In her book Moral boundaries: A Political<br />

Argument for an Ethic of Care Joan Tronto, for instance, claims that the philosophy<br />

based entirely on rationality should be put in a historical perspective.<br />

This analysis is used by the author as a theoretical lever to free herself of the<br />

– especially in Germany – powerful dominance of the Kantian inheritance. She also<br />

also pays attention to the influential American bio-ethicist Leon Kass, because she<br />

feels that his book Life, Liberty and the Defence of Dignity deserves particular notice.<br />

Furthermore she sets out to develop my principles in dealing with medical -<br />

technological innovations. She puts forward the proposition that technical<br />

development should contribute to a clear individual picture of a “gratifying” life. A<br />

reflection on the objectives of human conduct would constitute a basis for the<br />

judgment of phenomena; it allows distinguishing between the developments that<br />

contribute to the “success” of a life and the ones that do not.<br />

Methodically the author has been inspired by Hans Jonas’ book Das Prinzip<br />

Verantwortung (The Principle of Responsibility) in which he uses a heuristic key, as a<br />

pair of glasses, which clearly show certain connections in an otherwise complex and<br />

muddled whole. She does not, however, choose the same heuristic principle as<br />

Jonas, whose recommendation of “fear” as the deciding factor in the observation of<br />

technology has for decades given shape to the reality of the German Federal<br />

Republic.<br />

Instead of fear the author presents “Joy of Living”, the old eudemonic<br />

guideline, as the heuristic principle that gives information about the objectives of a<br />

gratifying life. She looks at its various aspects and refers to three philosophical<br />

traditions: the concept of biophily as it is described by Erich Fromm, the principles of<br />

Epicure and the Philosophy of the Art of Living, which is of all times, and which finds<br />

at present an advocate in Wilhelm Schmid. Based on these concepts she works out a<br />

series of social and individual presuppositions and conditions for dealing with<br />

medical-technological innovations, which would have to be considered when looking<br />

for ways to use technology as a tool to add to the joy of living.<br />

251

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!