09.12.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

236 foreign exchange<br />

loss due to an adverse movement of the schilling<br />

against the pound, but would also forgo the<br />

possibility of a gain if the movement were in the<br />

opposite direction. Refraining from hedging is<br />

known as maintaining an open position.<br />

In long-run equilibrium, exchange rates are<br />

affected by purchasing power parity and by interest<br />

rate parity, which are linked by the International<br />

Fisher Effect. The first states that if there is a<br />

discrepancy in the purchasing powers of the<br />

currencies of two countries, such that the prices<br />

of goods and services in Country A are higher than<br />

those in Country B when compared using the<br />

exchange rate between the two currencies, then the<br />

inhabitants of Country A will tend to purchase<br />

goods and services as far as possible in Country B.<br />

This will affect A's balance of payments<br />

negatively, and B's positively. Consequently, the<br />

spot exchange rate between the two countries'<br />

currencies will tend to shift so as to remove the<br />

discrepancy in their purchasing powers. This<br />

tendency will be reflected in the forward exchange<br />

rates.<br />

The two parity models are similar, but in the<br />

case of interest rate parity it is the price of money<br />

�that is, interest rates) and investment flows that<br />

are involved. Differences in interest rates between<br />

countries would, other things being equal, induce<br />

investors to shift their funds from the country with<br />

the lower interest rates to that with the higher ones.<br />

One reason why this may not happen is the<br />

International Fisher Effect; in other words, the<br />

country with the higher nominal interest rates<br />

typically also has a higher expected inflation rate,<br />

so that after correcting for expected inflation, the<br />

real interest rates do not differ. Continuing the<br />

previous example, a fall in the exchange rate of<br />

Country A's currency would increase the prices of<br />

A's imports and decrease the prices of its exports.<br />

This, in turn, might lead to inflation in Country A.<br />

Investors in interest-bearing assets in Country A<br />

would expect a higher nominal interest rate so as to<br />

be compensated for the inflation �so as to receive<br />

the same real rate).<br />

Hence, there is a relationship between the spot<br />

and forward exchange rates of the two currencies<br />

on the one hand, and the difference between the<br />

interest rates applicable to the two currencies on<br />

the other hand. This relationship �interest rate<br />

parity) is such that the financial outcome of an<br />

inhabitant of Country A hedging an amount<br />

payable in Country B's currency in �for instance)<br />

six months should be much the same as using the<br />

money markets to borrow the amount required at<br />

A's six-month interest rate, converting it into<br />

Country B's currency in the spot market and<br />

placing it on deposit at B's six-month interest rate<br />

until required to make the payment. If the financial<br />

outcomes of using the money market and using the<br />

forward exchange market were significantly different,<br />

then market operators known as arbitrageurs<br />

could make riskless profits by exploiting the<br />

discrepancy; and by doing so they would cause<br />

interest rates and forward exchange rates to move<br />

towards the levels required to produce interest rate<br />

parity.<br />

These relationships assume that the currencies<br />

involved are fully convertible and not subject to<br />

exchange and other currency controls. Because of<br />

the potentially disruptive effects of exchange rate<br />

variations in international trade, forcing businesses<br />

to choose between the costs of hedging and the<br />

risks of exchange losses, various attempts have been<br />

made to stabilise exchange rates. One such attempt<br />

was the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944, setting<br />

up a worldwide system of fixed exchange rates in<br />

which the US dollar served as a standard to which<br />

all other convertible currencies were pegged. In<br />

turn, the US dollar was convertible into gold at a<br />

rate guaranteed by the US Federal Reserve Bank.<br />

To this extent, the Bretton Woods system resembled<br />

a revival of the old gold standard, which<br />

had prevailed until it was abandoned in the 1920s.<br />

Adjustments to the exchange rates of individual<br />

currencies �normally devaluations) were possible on<br />

an exceptional basis. For example, in 1948 the<br />

pound was devalued from $4 to $2.8, a devaluation<br />

of 30 per cent.<br />

Apart from such major adjustments, exchange<br />

rates of currencies into the US dollar were<br />

expected to vary within a relatively narrow band.<br />

In the 1970s, the United States ceased to be able to<br />

guarantee the convertibility of its dollar into gold,<br />

and in connection with this the system of fixed<br />

exchange rates was abandoned. An era of floating<br />

rates ensued. Subsequently, rather than a worldwide<br />

system of fixed exchange rates, the idea of<br />

currency unions has gained some acceptance,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!