09.12.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

544 sociology<br />

ensues on account of perceived status differences<br />

and the resultant need to respectively talk down or<br />

up to each other. As other researchers have shown,<br />

tour guides, also represent another instance of<br />

sociolinguistic patterns of superordination and<br />

subordination when, from a position of privileged<br />

knowledge, they attempt to `secularise' a sight for<br />

visitors. Indeed, so ubiquitous are linguistic encounters<br />

in tourism that they may be considered as<br />

extensive as the phenomenon of tourism itself.<br />

Hence the need for sociolinguistic analyses.<br />

References<br />

Cohen, E. and Cooper, R. �1986) `Language and<br />

tourism', Annals of Tourism Research 13: 533±63.<br />

Dann, G. �1996) The Language of Tourism:A<br />

Sociolinguistics Perspective, Wallingford: CAB International.<br />

Hollinshead, K. �1993) `The truth about Texas',<br />

unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A & M<br />

University.<br />

Trudgill, P. �1983) Sociolinguistics:An Introduction to<br />

Language and Society, London: Penguin Books.<br />

sociology<br />

GRAHAM M.S. DANN, UK<br />

The sociology of tourism is a target field or<br />

specialty of sociology. It applies approaches,<br />

theories and methodologies to the study of<br />

touristic phenomena, and of their wider social<br />

significance and consequences. The sociology of<br />

tourism concerns itself specifically with the motivations,<br />

roles and social relations of tourists, the<br />

structure and dynamics of the tourist system and of<br />

touristic institutions, the nature of attractions and<br />

their representations, and the impact of tourism<br />

on destinations and host societies. Some researchers<br />

�MacCannell 1976; Urry 1990) also see in<br />

tourism an avenue through which the wider<br />

problems of modern �and postmodern) society<br />

could be examined. The field has a relatively brief<br />

history; although some German sociologists analysed<br />

tourism in the 1930s, the first publications in<br />

English appeared only in the 1960s. Nevertheless,<br />

the intellectual perspective and theoretical ap-<br />

proach to tourism underwent significant transformations<br />

over this short period. The early work in<br />

the field has been reviewed in Cohen �1984); the<br />

main theoretical approaches have been examined<br />

in Dann and Cohen �1991).<br />

The principal intellectual issue in the field is the<br />

relationship between Western tourism and modernity<br />

�or postmodernity). In comparison, the<br />

transformational impact of tourism on host settings<br />

± though of considerable practical importance ±<br />

has rarely become a focus of much intellectual<br />

concern �Bruner 1991). The controversy regarding<br />

the nature of modern tourism was initiated by a<br />

biting critique of tourism by an American social<br />

historian, Boorstin �1964). Within a broader<br />

critique of contemporary America, he contrasted<br />

the traveller of the past with the modern tourist,<br />

claiming that the former submitted to the tribulations<br />

of travel to achieve authentic experiences,<br />

while the latter thrives on easily attainable,<br />

inauthentic `pseudo-events', contrived by locals<br />

for touristic consumption. Boorstin thus sees in<br />

tourism just another domain in which the superficiality<br />

and inauthenticity of modern life is<br />

manifested.<br />

The first sociological paradigm for the study of<br />

tourism, which informed the discourse of the<br />

topic throughout the 1970s and 1980s, was<br />

proposed by MacCannell �1973, 1976). In studied<br />

opposition to Boorstin's conception of the tourist,<br />

he sought to formulate a distinctly sociological<br />

approach to tourism, disengaged from and contrasting<br />

with its common sense image.<br />

MacCannell conceived of the tourist as an<br />

alienated modern, who ± in contrast to Boorstin's<br />

view ± engages in a serious quest for authentic<br />

experiences, in remote, non-modern places and<br />

pre-modern times. Rather than a superficial<br />

consumer of pseudo-events, the tourist is construed<br />

as a secular pilgrim, whose quest for<br />

authenticity is analogous to the quest for the<br />

sacred in simpler, pre-modern societies. MacCannell,<br />

however, stresses that in contrast to the latter,<br />

the `sacred' of modernity �in the Durkheimian<br />

sense of symbols of `society') is split up, manifesting<br />

itself in a multiplicity of attractions. The<br />

secular tourist's visit to the attractions is analogous<br />

to the religious pilgrim's homage to sacred<br />

sites. However, as tourists proliferate at a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!