09.12.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

attitudes. Contemporary thinking about attitudes<br />

suggests that there are linked sets of attitudes on<br />

key topics �such as health, politics, sexuality or<br />

tourism development). These linked attitudes have<br />

been termed `social representations'. In order to<br />

understand attitudes to a specific topic such as<br />

tourism development, it is often useful to understand<br />

people's network of attitudes or the social<br />

representation of the whole issue and to assess<br />

people's social identity or group membership,<br />

since social forces are important determinants of<br />

why people hold attitudes.<br />

Current attitude change theories propose that<br />

there are two different ways in which people can<br />

process information to create or change attitudes:<br />

either through a central route, which is also<br />

referred to as systematic processing, or through a<br />

peripheral route, sometimes known as heuristic<br />

processing. When peripheral processing is at work,<br />

people use very little of the available information<br />

and they employ short cuts and familiar routines to<br />

guide behaviour. In central processing, people<br />

carefully examine and analyse much of the<br />

available information. Attitudes developed through<br />

systematic processing are likely to be more detailed,<br />

more consistently related to behaviour and harder<br />

to change than those adopted through a peripheral<br />

route. Peripheral processing is illustrated by tourists<br />

accepting stereotypic clicheÂd views of the visited<br />

hosts and holding attitudes towards them which are<br />

largely influenced by media and external sources<br />

rather than by a thoughtful consideration of the<br />

actual contact experiences. Research on mindfulness<br />

is also linked to this approach, with the<br />

concept of mindfulness referring to a central<br />

processing route and that of mindlessness characterising<br />

the peripheral or heuristic approach.<br />

In assessing attitudes, it is valuable to use a<br />

number of control groups or baseline measures in<br />

field studies since the very process of researching<br />

attitudes and trying to monitor their change can<br />

influence the investigation. Attitudes are traditionally<br />

measured on five to seven-point rating scales<br />

with ranges such as `strongly agree' to `strongly<br />

disagree'. In evaluating attitude research, it is<br />

usually insightful to ask both the direction<br />

�evaluative) component of the attitude and the<br />

importance of holding that attitude on the topic to<br />

the individual.<br />

There are frequent comments in the literature<br />

that attitudes do not form a close link to actual<br />

behaviour. There are several reasons why such<br />

inconsistencies might exist. It may be that the<br />

questions asked to elicit attitudes were not<br />

sufficiently specific. Additionally, if the topic is of<br />

little relevance to the individual, the respondent<br />

may express an attitude which has few immediate<br />

behavioural consequences. It is notable that<br />

negative attitudes are often more detailed and<br />

well-organised and are likely to have been subject<br />

to central or systematic processing. Much existing<br />

tourism consumer research has been cast within a<br />

loose attitudinal framework, as have studies relating<br />

to the recreational use of the environment.<br />

These studies could be enhanced by closer<br />

attention to contemporary advances in attitude<br />

theory and measurement. Several studies of<br />

tourists' post-return attitude changes have been<br />

reported. In these studies group package tourists<br />

were shown to change their attitudes as a<br />

consequence of the actual experience. When<br />

favourable holidays took place and initial predeparture<br />

attitudes were positive, even more<br />

positive attitudes were acquired. Less satisfactory<br />

holiday experiences and moderate pre-trip state of<br />

mind resulted in some negative attitudes to host<br />

cultures.<br />

See also: community attitude<br />

Further reading<br />

Chaiken, S. and Stangor, C. �1987) Àttitudes and<br />

attitude change', Annual Review of Psychology 38:<br />

575±630.<br />

Pearce, P.L. �1982) The Social Psychology of Tourist<br />

Behaviour, Oxford: Pergamon.<br />

Pearce, P.L., Moscardo, G.M. and Ross, G.F. �1996)<br />

Tourism Community Relationships, Oxford: Elsevier.<br />

Ryan, C. �1995) Assessing Tourist Satisfaction, London:<br />

Routledge.<br />

attraction<br />

attraction 35<br />

PHILIP L. PEARCE, AUSTRALIA<br />

Attractions are more than just a site or an event;<br />

they are an integral part of a larger tourism system

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!