09.12.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

carriers in particular markets. Most nations also<br />

had strict prohibitions on mergers between home<br />

nation and foreign airlines. Additionally, the extent<br />

of foreign ownership allowed for a home nation<br />

airline has been limited, usually in the 25±49 per<br />

cent range.<br />

As pressures for the globalisation of air services<br />

increased, many countries have relaxed their<br />

economic regulations and allowed more competition.<br />

Approaches to these changes have varied<br />

from total, immediate airline deregulation, as in<br />

the United States and Canada, to liberalisation in<br />

which the transition is made in a slower, gradual<br />

process, as in the European Union. Open skies<br />

agreements, which promote a free market<br />

approach to international air services agreements,<br />

have become more widespread throughout the<br />

world. These changes have allowed international<br />

airlines to enter into strategic alliances with each<br />

other. Such cooperative agreements are legal and<br />

often do not violate existing anti-merger and<br />

acquisition laws of the nations involved.<br />

One intended outcome of these alliances is to<br />

allow seamless service in which passengers can<br />

buy a single ticket, check their baggage once and<br />

fly across the world via several airlines. The<br />

member carriers coordinate their schedules in<br />

order to minimise passenger waiting times and to<br />

increase load factors and economic viability of the<br />

service. Participating airlines also integrate frequent<br />

flyer programmes and airport lounge<br />

privileges, and may also combine elements such<br />

as aircraft maintenance, purchasing, reservation<br />

and catering functions. Economic rationales<br />

for these alliances include economies of scale,<br />

density and scope; declining unit costs; and offering<br />

a more competitive service in the marketplace.<br />

An example of the largest global alliance to date<br />

�1998) is the STAR alliance, in which Air Canada,<br />

Lufthansa, Scandinavian Airlines System, Thai<br />

International, United Airlines and Varig coordinate<br />

their services across a wide range of<br />

customer service departments. This vast global<br />

network allows passengers and air cargo to reach<br />

almost anyplace in the world with the assurance of<br />

consistently high standards of service and safety.<br />

The formation of such mega global alliances are<br />

not without their critics. Some observers feel that<br />

it still remains to be seen if such agreements will be<br />

profitable in the long term. They state that current<br />

alliances focus primarily on high levels of customer<br />

service and potential revenue increases. Significant<br />

cost reductions due to factors such as decreases in<br />

workforce levels, combined purchasing power, use<br />

of common and integrated computer reservation<br />

systems, and schedule coordination have not yet<br />

materialised in many cases.<br />

In addition, corporate culture and personality<br />

clashes have occurred in some alliances. Infrastructure<br />

problems exist at some key hub<br />

airports, and difficulties thus arise in allocating<br />

gates and take-off and landing slots to new and<br />

existing airlines. Such problems, along with aviation<br />

policy differences between the United States<br />

and the United Kingdom, have stalled the<br />

proposed British Airways and American Airlines<br />

alliance. Finally, some observers fear that competition<br />

will decrease and fares will increase as a result<br />

of these alliances. Nevertheless, airlines throughout<br />

the world are attempting to position themselves in<br />

the most advantageous alliances. Global networks<br />

are changing rapidly. We can be confident that<br />

these trends will continue for some time.<br />

Further reading<br />

transportation, globalisation of 599<br />

Gialloreto, L. �1988) Strategic Airline Management:The<br />

Global War Begins, London: Pitman. �Describes<br />

future global airline networks and the necessary<br />

changes to achieve them.)<br />

Leonhardt, D. and Echikson, W. �1998) `Taking a<br />

whack at airline alliances', Business Week, March<br />

16: 106. �Points out the potential problems in<br />

airline alliances.)<br />

Oum, T.H. and Taylor, A.J. �1995) `Emerging<br />

patterns in intercontinental air linkages and<br />

implications for international route allocation<br />

policy', Transportation Journal 34�7): 5±27. �Provides<br />

an analysis of changes taking place in<br />

international air services.)<br />

`S T A R alliance unlikely to impact on airline cost<br />

cutting' �1997) Airfinance Journal, June: 18. �Describes<br />

the world's largest global alliance to that<br />

date.)<br />

DAVID B. VELLENGA, USA<br />

WILLEM J. HOMAN, USA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!