09.12.2012 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

quality of the environment. In the more aware,<br />

sophisticated and technologically-based societies of<br />

the industrialised world, environmental quality is<br />

equated with quality of life. This in turn assumes<br />

access to a range of creature comforts and amenity<br />

resources which are wanted to enrich human<br />

welfare well beyond basic needs of existence.<br />

In tourism, environmental quality can act as a<br />

major attraction or an impediment. The environment<br />

of a destination which is seen to be<br />

impaired by deficiencies in physical attributes �such<br />

as water quality), or shortcomings in the social<br />

sphere �like crime), will have a negative effect on<br />

tourist numbers and satisfaction. Conversely, a<br />

tourism facility or destination which strives to build<br />

and maintain an attractive, functional and secure<br />

environment of high quality can anticipate increased<br />

patronage. The challenge then is to ensure<br />

that greater numbers do not lead to a consequent<br />

deterioration in environmental quality.<br />

Evaluation of the quality of environments for<br />

tourism is perhaps even more susceptible to<br />

subjectivity. Whereas most environments probably<br />

have some potential for tourism, this is not easy to<br />

establish with any precision because of the<br />

personalised manner in which settings are selected<br />

and experienced. Generalisation and interpersonal<br />

comparisons are of doubtful validity and the<br />

multiple characteristics of a tourism environment<br />

make disaggregation and evaluation of environmental<br />

quality a risky undertaking.<br />

Despite the essentially subjective nature of the<br />

variables involved, much attention is being devoted<br />

to developing useful measures of environmental<br />

quality. However, once again, achieving agreement<br />

on what constitutes superior quality and the many<br />

aspects which call for assessment make the task<br />

problematic. The best that can be achieved is the<br />

application of a specific set of environmental<br />

indicators to a discrete attribute of the tourism<br />

environment �such as noise levels and traffic<br />

congestion). Even then, care needs to be taken<br />

that a simple additive process is not applied to<br />

generate a composite representation of environmental<br />

quality, especially when intangible factors<br />

such as aesthetics can blur the overall setting.<br />

State of the environment reports are now being<br />

produced by many industrialised countries and<br />

such reporting is an obligation for member nations<br />

quality, environmental 481<br />

of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation<br />

and Development. This body uses a<br />

pressure-state-response model for its reporting<br />

system. The model is based on the concept of<br />

causality. Human activities, such as tourism, exert<br />

pressures on the environment and change its state<br />

or condition. The changed state of the environment<br />

leads to responses by way of policy<br />

initiatives, legislative reforms and changes in public<br />

behaviour. These responses complete the cycle by<br />

influencing tourism activities which exert pressure<br />

on the environment.<br />

Clearly, monitoring the quality of the environment<br />

and the way it responds to pressures is<br />

fundamental to determining whether current<br />

patterns of tourism are sustainable. A common<br />

approach, noted above, is the development of a<br />

specific set of indicators for each matter of<br />

environmental concern. Such indicators need to<br />

be scientifically credible, easily understood, costeffective,<br />

and serve as a robust, sensitive indicator<br />

of environmental change and potential problems.<br />

In terms of the OECD model, indicators can be<br />

developed to measure the pressures on the<br />

environment arising from tourism; the condition<br />

or state of the environment �that is, the environmental<br />

quality as a consequence of tourism); and<br />

the extent and effectiveness of responses to<br />

environmental concerns.<br />

In the context of a tourism facility, an indicator<br />

of increased environmental pressure might be the<br />

introduction of motorised pleasure craft on to a<br />

confined waterbody. Indicators of the consequent<br />

state of the environment might include the<br />

presence of air and water pollutants, noise nuisance<br />

and erosion of foreshores. Indicators of response<br />

could in this case encompass a range of measures<br />

including speed restrictions, licensing and zoning.<br />

The effectiveness of societal responses to pressure<br />

and changes to environmental quality should in<br />

turn be subject to appropriate performance<br />

indicators and with reference to established<br />

base-line conditions. By reporting regularly and<br />

systematically on the state of the environment and<br />

responding appropriately, the tourism industry can<br />

help ensure its long-term sustainability.<br />

See also: codes of ethics, environmental;<br />

ecologically sustainable tourism; environmental

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!