3. Uluslararası Beyaz Et Kongresi

Third International Symp. on Livestock Wastes. 1975; 83–84 and 92.Özek, E.: Tarımdan
Kaynaklanan Çevre Kirlenmesi ve Simülasyon Çalışmaları. Ankara Üniv., Fen Bilimleri
Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 1994; 79 s.
5. Özek, E.: Tarımdan Kaynaklanan Çevre Kirlenmesi ve Simülasyon Çalışmaları. Ankara Üniv.,
Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi. 1994; 79 s.
6. Nahm, K.H.: Feed formulations to reduce N excretion and ammonia emission from poultry
manure. Bioresources. 2007; 98: 2282-2300.
7. John, P.C., James, J.C., John, E.A.: Nutrient Content of Livestock and Poultry Manure,
Clemson University, https://www.clemson.edu/cafls/safes/faculty_staff/research/chastain_
nutrient_content_manure.pdf. 2001. Erişim Tarihi: 15 Aralık 2014.
8. Guerra-Rodriguez, E., Diaz-Ravina, M., Vazquez, M.: Co-composting of chestnut burr and
leaf litter with solid poultry manure. Bioresour Technol. 2001; 78: 107-109.
9. Moore, P.A., Daniel, T.C.,Sharpley, A.N., Wood, C.W.: Poultry manure management. Chapter
3. 1998; 60-75.
10. Eleroğlu, H., Yıldırım, A.: Tavukçuluk Katı Atıklarının Tavuk Gübresine İşlenerek Çevre
Kirliliğinin Azaltılması. Katı atık ve Çevre, 2011; 34-43.
11. Camcı, Ö., Sarıca, M., Şekeroğlu, A.: Kafes Sisteminde Gübrenin Uzaklaştırılması ve
Yönetimi. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi. 2013; 10: 35-39.
12. Parsons, C.M.: Nutrient utilization and methods of assessment – an environmental perspective.
In: Deagussa Technical Symposium. 1995; 1–5.
13. Kohn, R.: Use of Animal Nutrition to Manage Nitrogen Emissions from Animal Agriculture.
2.Animal Mid-Atlantic Nutrition Conference. 2012; 25-30.
14. Kristensen, H.H., Wathes, C.M.: Ammonia and poultry welfare: a review. World’s Poul. Sci.
Journal. 2000: 56: 235–245
15. Ferket P.R., Van Heugten, E., Van Kempen, T.A.T.G., Angel, R.: Nutritional strategies to
reduce environmental emissions from nonruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 2002; E (Suppl. 2), E168–
E182.
16. Schutte, J.B., Jong, J., van Kempen; G.J.M.: Dietary protein in relation to requirement and
pollution in pigs during the body weight range of 20-40 kg. In Nitrogen flow in pig production
and environmental consequences (Verstegen, M.W.A., L.A. den Hartog, G.J.M. van Kempen,
and J.H.M. Metz, eds.),1991; 259-263.
17. Meluzgi, A., Sirri, F., Tallarico, N., Franchini, A.: Nitrogen retention and performance of
brown laying hens on diets with diVerent protein content and constant concentration of amino
acids and energy. Br. Poul. Sci. 2001; 42 (2), 213–217.
18. Moran, Jr., E.T., Bushong, R.D., Bilgili, S.F.: Reducing dietary crude protein for broilers
while satisfying amino acid requirements by least-cost formulation: Live performance, litter
composition, and yield of fast-food carcass cuts at six weeks. Poultry Sci. 1992; 71: 1687-
1694.
19. Jacob, J.P., Blair, R., Bennett, D.C.,Scott, T.A., Newberry, R.C: The effect of dietary protein
and amino acid levels during the grower phase on nitrogen excretion of broiler chickens.
1994; Proc Can Soc Anim Sci . 309.
20. Hassan, H.M.A., Abd-Elsamee, M.O., El-Sherbiny, A.E., Samy, A., Mohamed, M.A.: Effects
of protein level and avizyme supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and
nitrogen excretion of broiler chicks. J. Agric. & Environ. Sci. 2011; 10(4): 551-560.
21. Faria Filho, D.E., Rosa, P.S., Vieira, B.S., Macari, M., Furlan, R.L.: Protein levels and
environmental temperature effects on carcass characteristics, performance, and nitrogen
excretion of broiler chickens from 7 to 21 days of age. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 2005; 7: 4.
656