29.01.2013 Aufrufe

Mehrsprachigkeit in Europa: Plurilinguismo in Europa ... - EURAC

Mehrsprachigkeit in Europa: Plurilinguismo in Europa ... - EURAC

Mehrsprachigkeit in Europa: Plurilinguismo in Europa ... - EURAC

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

K. Simitopoulou-Kotzamani, N. I. Xirotiris<br />

under a broad holistic approach, the term co-evolution refers to the simultaneous evolution<br />

of both natural and cultural traits, mutually <strong>in</strong>fl uenc<strong>in</strong>g each other, as humank<strong>in</strong>d proceeds<br />

through time.<br />

Several general ideas about evolution concern all liv<strong>in</strong>g creatures, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g humans:<br />

• Evolution concerns totals of populations rather than <strong>in</strong>dividuals;<br />

• Variability with<strong>in</strong> and between populations is a fruitful substrate for evolution;<br />

• Selection functions upon several alternative genotypes, among which only those with the<br />

best fi tness <strong>in</strong> the particular environments are susta<strong>in</strong>able.<br />

• Evolution (at population level) can be described as a change of the gene pool content,<br />

expressed as alternation of gene frequencies through time;<br />

• The changes observed at a certa<strong>in</strong> moment are the collective result of the dynamic<br />

<strong>in</strong>teraction of evolutionary forces (mutation, migration, random genetic drift and natural<br />

selection);<br />

• Any liv<strong>in</strong>g population is de facto evolutionary successful, s<strong>in</strong>ce it has responded positively<br />

to its environmental challenges, be<strong>in</strong>g able to produce and susta<strong>in</strong> potentially fertile offspr<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

Through this long last<strong>in</strong>g dynamic process the human creatures developed a powerful bra<strong>in</strong>,<br />

thus becom<strong>in</strong>g homos sapiens, able to th<strong>in</strong>k and communicate through symbols, an ability<br />

which, among others, was fundamental for the development of language. The physiological and<br />

mental genetic predisposition of humans to use language(s), led to the development of advanced<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercommunication codes. This unique qualifi cation was crucial for the gradual transition of<br />

human population groups from herds to tribes, to societies, up to today’s cyber-society.<br />

Although there is no way to dist<strong>in</strong>guish sharply when and how this evolutionary “upgrade”<br />

has happened, it is undeniable that language offered a great evolutionary advantage towards<br />

the creation of collective culture, <strong>in</strong> favour of the populations’ survival.<br />

Culture is derived <strong>in</strong> human populations, it is heritable at group level, it is variable accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to its (natural and cultural) host<strong>in</strong>g ecosystems, it evolves. Actually the evolution of cultural<br />

traits <strong>in</strong> human populations cannot be viewed separately from their biological basis and their<br />

natural environments. Only those who survived and reproduced themselves <strong>in</strong> their ecosystems,<br />

those with the best fi tness to their natural environments, were able to promote their cultures<br />

(language, believes, traditions etc.)<br />

Vice versa, a process of cultural selection also operates. Frequencies of cultural traits and<br />

attitudes can change through time, respond<strong>in</strong>g to the challenges of the contemporary cultural<br />

environment. This affects the mat<strong>in</strong>g systems and reproductive choices, gradually lead<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

the alternation of the gene pool (or the biological profi le) of a population. As culture evolves, it<br />

feeds back biological evolution, actually modify<strong>in</strong>g the biological structure of the population.<br />

Consequently, co-evolution, i.e. the cont<strong>in</strong>uous <strong>in</strong>teraction of biological and environmental<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g cultural) factors through time is recognised as the driv<strong>in</strong>g force of unlimited bra<strong>in</strong><br />

development, which, <strong>in</strong> turn, crucially <strong>in</strong>fl uences endless environmental transformation.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Steven P<strong>in</strong>ker<br />

“Nature and Nurture are not alternatives. Learn<strong>in</strong>g itself must be accomplished by <strong>in</strong>nate<br />

circuitry, and what is <strong>in</strong>ert is not a set of rigid <strong>in</strong>structions for the behaviour but rather<br />

programmes that take the <strong>in</strong>formation from the senses and give rise to new thoughts and<br />

528<br />

Multil<strong>in</strong>gualism.<strong>in</strong>db 528 4-12-2006 12:30:30

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!