03.04.2013 Views

An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax

An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax

An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. וּנאט֫ ָ ח ָ וּז הוהי ֑ אוֹלהֲ וֹל<br />

8. תָּ ְנ ַכ֫ ָשׁ הז ֶ ןוֹיּ ִצ־רהַ ׃וֹבּ<br />

10.<br />

Was it not YHWH whom we have sinned against<br />

(him)?<br />

Isa 42:24<br />

Mount Zion which you dwell on (it)<br />

Ps 74:2<br />

A z form can also be used in a so-called independent relative clause.<br />

9. ׃יב־וּכ ִ ְפּהְ ֶנ יתִּ ְבהַ ֫ א־ה ָ זֶ וְ Those I love have turned against me.<br />

׃הרָ ֵפּ֫ סַ אֲ ו ַ יתי ִ זִ֫ ח־ה ָ זֶ ְ<br />

Job 19:19<br />

ו That which I have seen I will tell you.<br />

Job 15:17<br />

c In considering the quasi-relative or determinative use of the z forms, we need <strong>to</strong><br />

reconsider the basic sense of הז. 21 From the use of הז and its equivalents as an<br />

attributive demonstrative (e.g.,’the person, this one’), there developed a substantive<br />

use: ‘the person, the one of (something),’ which is equivalent <strong>to</strong> ‘the person who…’<br />

By definition z forms governing another substantive are not relative pronouns, but<br />

since they bracket a qualifying substantive with a preceding substantive they may be<br />

regarded in this use as quasi-relatives. In such constructions their deictic force and<br />

their basic appositive syntax can still be felt strongly. (It was out of this quasi-relative<br />

use that the relative uses treated above developed.)<br />

d The determinative may be used in dependent relative clauses. 22<br />

11.<br />

יני ַ ס ִ ה ֶז הוהי ֑ ינֵ ְפּ ִמ 23<br />

before YHWH, the one of Sinai<br />

Judg 5:5<br />

12. ׃ם ָלוֹע ְל וּז רוֹדּה־ן ַ ִמ from the generation, the one of everlasting (i.e., the<br />

everlasting generation)<br />

Ps 12:8<br />

It also occurs in independent relative clauses, in true determinative usage, 24 either<br />

as a predicate in a nominal clause (# 13) or as a construct (# 14).<br />

21<br />

Allegro, “Demonstrative Element z,” 311.<br />

22<br />

Isa 23:13 may be another example, but cf. 17.4.1.<br />

23<br />

Cf. ˒Ihym zh syny in Ps 68:9. It may be that in origin the phrase zh syny was an<br />

independent clause, as is assumed by, e.g., F. M. Cross, Canaanite Myth and <strong>Hebrew</strong><br />

Epic (Cambridge: Harvard University, 1973) 164; this would be in conformity with<br />

comparable usage in other Semitic languages.<br />

24<br />

The independent use is clearest in Arabic, in such Qur˒anic phrases as dū sa˓atin ‘he<br />

of wealth (i.e., a rich man).’ dū ˓usrin ‘he of poverty (i.e., a deb<strong>to</strong>r),’ dū mirratin ‘he<br />

of wisdom (i.e., Muhammad),’ dū haṭṭin ˓aẓīmin ‘he of great fortune,’ dū l-˒awtād<br />

‘Lord of Stakes (i.e., Pharaoh),’ and the divine titles, dū l-faḍli l-˓aẓīmi ‘Lord of the<br />

Grace Unbounded,’ dū l-qūwati ‘Lord of Power,’ and dū l-˓arši (l-majīd) ‘Lord of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!