03.04.2013 Views

An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax

An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax

An Introduction to Biblical Hebrew Syntax

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c Clausal waw is a simple conjunction, that is, it places propositions or clauses one<br />

after another, without indicating the hierarchical relation between them. <strong>Biblical</strong><br />

<strong>Hebrew</strong> frequently joins logically subordinate clauses <strong>to</strong> a main clause either<br />

asyndetically or, more often, syndetically with this conjunction. G. B. Caird justly<br />

censors philologists who have inferred from this feature of the language that the<br />

<strong>Hebrew</strong>s were intellectually naïve.<br />

Yet there are eminent philologists who have drawn strangely faulty inferences from it. “The<br />

Semitic sentence is a succession of short sentences linked <strong>to</strong>gether by simple co-ordinate<br />

conjunctions. The principal mark, therefore, of <strong>Hebrew</strong> and especially of classical <strong>Hebrew</strong><br />

style is that it is what the Greeks called lexis eiromenê ‘speech strung <strong>to</strong>gether’ like a row of<br />

beads.…It will, therefore, be readily unders<strong>to</strong>od that philosophical reasoning and sustained<br />

argument were beyond the grasp of the <strong>Hebrew</strong> intellect or, at any rate, beyond its power of<br />

expression” [G. R. Driver].<br />

Driver is on sounder ground when he describes this as a feature of <strong>Hebrew</strong> style than when he<br />

attempts <strong>to</strong> deduce from it the limitations of <strong>Hebrew</strong> thought. <strong>Hebrew</strong> possesses words for<br />

‘if’, ‘because’ and ‘therefore’; and any language which has such words is capable of being<br />

used for logical thought. 7<br />

Although <strong>Hebrew</strong> relies heavily on waw, other indica<strong>to</strong>rs in the text’s surface<br />

grammar sometimes mark out more precise logical values. Moreover, the patterns of<br />

the use of waw allow for precision.<br />

[Page 650] d We have already considered waw-relative clauses (Chaps. 32, 33); here<br />

we primarily treat other types of clauses joined by w« ( ו). ְ A starting point is provided<br />

by T. O. Lambdin, who analyzes clauses joined by w« in<strong>to</strong> two types.<br />

(1) conjunctive-sequential, in which the second clause is temporally or logically<br />

posterior or consequent <strong>to</strong> the first, and<br />

(2) disjunctive, in which the second clause may be in various relations, all<br />

nonsequential, with the first.<br />

The major device in <strong>Hebrew</strong> for signalling the difference between conjunctive and<br />

disjunctive clauses is the type of word which stands immediately after the w«-:<br />

w«- (or wa-) + verb is conjunctive [-sequential]<br />

w«- + non-verb is disjunctive. 8<br />

We have already seen that waw + the suffix conjugation can be purely conjunctive<br />

(32.3) 9 and that relative waw with the verb can be epexegetical (32.2.3e, 33.2.2). To<br />

7<br />

G. B. Caird, The Language and Imagery of the Bible (Philadelphia: Westminster,<br />

1980) 1–17.<br />

8<br />

T. O. Lambdin, <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Biblical</strong> <strong>Hebrew</strong> (New York: Scribner, 1971) 162.<br />

9<br />

Lambdin, <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Biblical</strong> <strong>Hebrew</strong>, 165.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!