28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4 - Signs & Symbols 161<br />

initiation ceremonies why he was neither naked nor clothed, to which he replies:<br />

"Because Masonry regards no one for his worldly wealth or honors; it is the<br />

internal, and not the external qualifications <strong>of</strong> a man that should recommend him<br />

to be made a Mason." 464 According to Duncan, in the Entered Apprentice degree,<br />

the candidate has a naked left breast and a naked left knee. He wears a slipper on<br />

his right foot, and has a bare left foot. In the Fellow Craft degree, the candidate<br />

has a naked right breast and a naked right knee. He wears a slipper on his left<br />

foot, and has a bare right foot. In the Master Mason degree, the candidate wears<br />

only his shirt and drawers, so that both breasts and legs are bare, as well as both<br />

feet (for illustrations, see Sections 8.1.1.1. - 8.1.1.3). 465 Nakedness in<br />

<strong>Freemasonry</strong> alludes to equality before God, in contrast to the Biblical meaning<br />

<strong>of</strong> figurative uncleanness:<br />

Slipshod<br />

In Scriptural symbology, nakedness denoted sin, and clothing,<br />

protection. But the symbolism <strong>of</strong> Masonry on this subject is different.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re, to be 'neither naked nor clothed' is to make no claim through<br />

worldly wealth or honors to preferment in Masonry, where nothing but<br />

internal merit, which is unaffected by the outward appearance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

body, is received as a recommendation for admission. 466<br />

<strong>The</strong> shoe as a Masonic symbol is given different meanings. In the First<br />

Degree, it is seen as a symbol <strong>of</strong> a covenant to be entered into. This explanation<br />

is based on the Bible, respectively the Book <strong>of</strong> Ruth, chapter 4, verse 7-8, where<br />

it is said that "this was the manner in former time in Israel concerning redeeming<br />

and concerning changing, for to confirm all things; a man plucked <strong>of</strong>f his shoe,<br />

and gave it to his neighbor [...]" 467 as a sign <strong>of</strong> testimony. <strong>The</strong> IFL neglects this<br />

interpretation when stating that "[d]ie in der Freimaurerei übliche S.-Symbolik<br />

geht auf die Reinigungszeremonien zurück. Die S.-Symbolik ist also als reiner<br />

"Konsekrationsakt" aufzufassen." 468 This is only true for the Third Degree <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Freemasonry</strong>, where the shoe is considered a symbol <strong>of</strong> discalceation 469 (this<br />

term is derived from the Latin "calceus," meaning "shoe"). <strong>The</strong> ceremony<br />

requires the removal <strong>of</strong> both shoes. Before entering a sacred place or walking on<br />

holy ground, the shoes have to be taken <strong>of</strong>f as a sign <strong>of</strong> reverence, just like<br />

Moses had done in front <strong>of</strong> the Burning Bush. A reference to this Biblical scene<br />

can be found in the Royal Arch Degree, where the Burning Bush is even one <strong>of</strong><br />

the stage requisites. Although the IFL fails to explain the special meaning <strong>of</strong> the<br />

464<br />

Duncan, p. 48.<br />

465<br />

Cf. ibid, p. 28; 59; 88.<br />

466<br />

EOF, p. 502.<br />

467<br />

Cited from the Bible in EOF, p. 687/688.<br />

468<br />

IFL, p. 1420.<br />

469<br />

Cf. CME, p. 213.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!