28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

82<br />

Chapter 3 - Overview <strong>of</strong> Rites<br />

pioneer as far as the question <strong>of</strong> initiating women is concerned. Mixed bodies<br />

began to be formed in France shortly after the invention <strong>of</strong> the Hauts Grades<br />

about 1738-40. At first, they were only para-Masonic institutions, but by 1760<br />

they became associated with French lodges. 222 In 1774, the French Grand Orient<br />

asserted control <strong>of</strong> such bodies and thereby expressed its recognition <strong>of</strong> their<br />

Masonic character, <strong>of</strong>ten sponsoring them: the mixed bodies became<br />

"adopted." 223 This technical term describes the relation between the androgynous<br />

orders and their foster parent, the Grand Orient de France. Hence, the term "Rites<br />

<strong>of</strong> Adoption." Just to name a few French Rites <strong>of</strong> Adoption with their founding<br />

dates: there were the "Companions <strong>of</strong> Penelope <strong>of</strong> Pallidium <strong>of</strong> Ladies" (1737-<br />

40), the "Knights and Ladies Rower" (1738 in Rouen; related to boats or ships),<br />

the "Dames <strong>of</strong> Mount Tabor" (about 1742 in Paris), and countless others.<br />

But was the kind <strong>of</strong> <strong>Freemasonry</strong> destined for women the same kind as for<br />

the men? What distinguishes adoptive Masonry from the "real" one? What kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> lessons are imparted to the women who are excluded from partaking in the<br />

true Masonic rituals? Lodges <strong>of</strong> adoption were created in France in the 18 th<br />

century in order to appease the women who did not keep back their verbal<br />

injuries against an institution that did not allow their participation. <strong>The</strong> Masons<br />

have learned from that and gave them their own lodges: "Die Freimaurerei hat,<br />

nachdem sie in Frankreich Eingang gefunden hatte, sonderliche Blüten gezeigt.<br />

Als ausschließlicher Männerbund gegründet, war sie seitens des schönen<br />

Geschlechtes mancherlei Mißdeutungen ausgesetzt [...]. Man fand einen galanten<br />

Ausweg, indem man Logen stiftete, in denen Männer und Frauen gemeinsam<br />

arbeiteten." 224 <strong>The</strong>se French lodges <strong>of</strong> adoption became very popular, so that in<br />

1781, Maria Antoinette could say about them, "[t]out le monde en est." 225 <strong>The</strong><br />

main occupation <strong>of</strong> these lodges <strong>of</strong> adoption were symbolic ceremonies,<br />

aesthetic conversations, and gorgeous feasts. After the French Revolution, this<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> lodges died out, but they were revived under the monarchy <strong>of</strong> the early<br />

19 th century. <strong>The</strong>y had never existed in England and were a typical French<br />

development:<br />

222 Cf. ibid, p. 8.<br />

223 Cf. ibid.<br />

224 IFL, p. 17.<br />

225 Cf. ibid, p. 18.<br />

226 IFL, p. 18.<br />

Im allgemeinen bewegte sich deren Wirken zwischen symbolischen<br />

Zeremonien, Wohltun und schönen Festen. Im Wirbel der französischen<br />

Revolution versanken alle diese galanten Bildungen, die außer in<br />

Frankreich vorübergehend nur noch in den von Frankreich kulturell<br />

beeinflußten Ländern Fuß fassen konnten. [...] Das geistige Leben der<br />

Adoptionslogen ist rege und steht auf schöner Höhe. Abgesehen von der<br />

Mitwirkung von Brüdern der patronisierenden Logen und deren<br />

Verantwortlichkeit gegenüber der Grande Lodge besteht kein<br />

Zusammenhang mit der Freimaurerei. 226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!