28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

Chapter 4 - Signs & Symbols<br />

cipher. But even in the middle <strong>of</strong> the 19 th century, Rob Morris from Kentucky<br />

was ostracized by the Masons for his printing the ritual in a code called<br />

"mnemonics." At the present time, many Grand Lodges in the United States<br />

authorize printed cipher rituals (a list <strong>of</strong> which is given in Section 4.4.2),<br />

whereas in Scotland, whole rituals are published in plain English, with only<br />

some keywords left out. Section 4.4.2 illustrates the comparison <strong>of</strong> such<br />

ritualistic ciphers.<br />

Secret cipher writing was not used much in the first three degrees <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Freemasonry</strong>, but it was common in the higher degrees. However, for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> concealment, the cipher soon lost its practical use due to the greatly<br />

developed art <strong>of</strong> deciphering. According to the EOF, "there is no cipher so<br />

complicated as to bid defiance for many hours to the penetrating skill <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experienced decipherer." 489<br />

4.4.1 Old Builders' Marks<br />

Although they do not comprise a complete "sign language," operative<br />

stonemasons' marks play an important role in a part <strong>of</strong> Masonry and thus will be<br />

dealt with briefly. Just as members <strong>of</strong> other trades had their hall marks, operative<br />

stonemasons marked the stones shaped by them for the purpose <strong>of</strong> recognition<br />

and payment <strong>of</strong> individual work, and <strong>of</strong>ten handed down their marks from father<br />

to son. <strong>The</strong> marks <strong>of</strong> various members <strong>of</strong> one family were distinguishable due to<br />

minor alterations or additional symbols. 490 Being easier to inscribe, marks were<br />

preferable to names, and they were usually simple in design and seldom<br />

resembled a particular object. Generally, they consisted <strong>of</strong> two to six straight<br />

lines and a corresponding number <strong>of</strong> angles. Sometimes, curves and more<br />

intricate patterns are found. As Coil puts it, these marks "do not appear to have<br />

had any symbolical or hieroglyphical significance." 491<br />

<strong>The</strong> earliest mentioning <strong>of</strong> marks as a distinctive sign <strong>of</strong> a lodge member is<br />

preserved in the minutes <strong>of</strong> the Lodge <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh from the year 1600, which<br />

contain signatures by operative Masons and also by the Laird <strong>of</strong> Auchinleck,<br />

who all affixed their marks. In 1670, 49 members signed the by-laws <strong>of</strong><br />

Aberdeen Lodge, and the majority affixed their marks, although most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

signers were non-operative, that is, "accepted" members.<br />

489 EOF, p. 151.<br />

490 Cf. Stillson and Hughan, p. 568.<br />

491 Cf. CME, p. 402.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!