28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7 - Rituals 623<br />

7.3.3 Comparison <strong>of</strong> Masonry with Rituals<br />

<strong>of</strong> Fraternal Insurance Organizations<br />

As stated in previous chapters, Masonic charity should reach as far as the<br />

Mason's "cabletow's length," which means that it is universal. It has also been<br />

shown that Masons maintain homes for their widows and orphans, and are<br />

obliged to help a brother in distress. Is Masonry, therefore, comparable with<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ane insurance companies? It would be easier to confirm that Masonry is not<br />

a mutual benefit association if the Masonic sources would not so <strong>of</strong>ten contradict<br />

each other on this topic. Thus, the Masonic Review <strong>of</strong> 1879 states that<br />

<strong>Freemasonry</strong> could do much more for its members in the sector <strong>of</strong> mutual<br />

benefit:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Masonic Institution is, in principle, a Mutual Benefit Association,<br />

but in practice it is so to but a very limited extent, - limited to what it<br />

should be, and is capable <strong>of</strong> being. In this feature <strong>of</strong> the Order it is<br />

excelled by other associations, when it ought to be foremost in all<br />

efforts to ameliorate misfortune. Every lodge could and ought to secure<br />

a certain benefit to its members, in case <strong>of</strong> misfortune, sickness, or<br />

death. <strong>The</strong>re is no reason why such provision should not be made in the<br />

by laws <strong>of</strong> every lodge, and we should be glad to see one lead <strong>of</strong>f in<br />

such a noble effort. It would win for itself a reputation and popularity<br />

that would be envied by all the Craft, and accomplish a good that enters<br />

into the very design <strong>of</strong> the Institution. Who will move in such a 'noble<br />

and glorious undertaking?' 1560<br />

<strong>The</strong> above-mentioned article further states that since the lodges do not make<br />

these provisions, their members have "associated themselves together, outside <strong>of</strong><br />

lodge organizations, to secure these benefits: hence the numerous 'Mutual<br />

Benefit Associations' among members in almost every State." 1561 <strong>The</strong> author <strong>of</strong><br />

that article then refers to the distinguished example <strong>of</strong> the Odd Fellows in the<br />

United States, who are advanced in the field <strong>of</strong> insurance and have "appointed a<br />

committee charged with the duty <strong>of</strong> inquiring into the true relations that should<br />

subsist between dues and benefits." 1562 Hereafter, the author gives an example <strong>of</strong><br />

how the relations could be in a Masonic lodge. It has to be considered that the<br />

text <strong>of</strong> the following calculation stems from the end <strong>of</strong> the 19 th century:<br />

Now suppose we consider the ratio as 1 in a 100. <strong>The</strong>n say there are 500<br />

members in the association. <strong>The</strong>n, at the ratio <strong>of</strong> 1 death in 100, there<br />

would be 5 deaths in a year. This would cost each member $5,00, while<br />

1560 <strong>The</strong> Masonic Review, vol. XXXVII, from 1870, p. 57.<br />

1561 Ibid.<br />

1562 Ibid, p. 59.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!