28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

44<br />

Chapter 2 – Historical Background<br />

the descent <strong>of</strong> North American Masonic Grand Lodges 86<br />

Although we want to underline the "universality" <strong>of</strong> <strong>Freemasonry</strong>, we have to<br />

take refuge in a rather contradictory expression used by Henderson and Pope in<br />

order to combine and separate different Masonic streams: the word "mainstream<br />

Masonry." This expression is ambiguous since it depends on the Masonic point<br />

<strong>of</strong> view from which it is seen. In other words, for a French Freemason<br />

"mainstream Masonry" would mean something different than for an English<br />

Freemason. Henderson and Pope, both confessed "mainstream Masons," define<br />

the largest and best known group <strong>of</strong> Masonic associations, which is <strong>of</strong>ficially<br />

unnamed, as "mainstream Masonry." This group comprises the premier Grand<br />

Lodge <strong>of</strong> the world (the United Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> England), together with the<br />

Grand Lodges <strong>of</strong> Ireland and Scotland, six Grand Lodges in Australia, ten in<br />

Canada, about fifty-one in the U.S.A., and many others throughout the world. 87<br />

<strong>The</strong> definition "mainstream" further includes certain characteristics which<br />

determine that this kind <strong>of</strong> Masonry is "lawful." And this lawfulness results in<br />

lodges being recognized or unrecognized by other "mainstream" lodges.<br />

Here, we already notice the problem which will accompany us as a leitmotif<br />

throughout this paper - if there is a "mainstream" Masonry, then there logically<br />

has to be an oppositional, a marginalized, and even an illegal kind <strong>of</strong> Masonry.<br />

"Mainstream" Masonry claims for itself the right to judge whether lodges based<br />

86 Reproduced from Henderson and Pope, vol. I, p. 212.<br />

87 Henderson and Pope, vol. II, p. 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!