28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 - Overview <strong>of</strong> Rites 89<br />

adorn the craft; the impropriety in making them our equals in one place,<br />

when from their social condition [...] we cannot do so in others, their not<br />

being, as a general thing FREE BORN; [...] finally, their not being, as a<br />

race, persons <strong>of</strong> 'good report,' or who can be 'well recommended' as<br />

subjects for initiation; they very seldom being persons who have any<br />

trade, estate, <strong>of</strong>fice, occupation, or visible way <strong>of</strong> acquiring an honest<br />

livelihood, and working for the craft, as becomes members <strong>of</strong> this<br />

ancient and honorable fraternity, but likewise something to spare for the<br />

works <strong>of</strong> charity, [...] 'eating no man's bread for naught [...].' 245<br />

While the racist lodge statements mentioned above are historical, we can<br />

observe similar objections in more modern times. Thus, the Grand Lodge, A.F.<br />

& A.M. <strong>of</strong> Texas, states in its Constitution and Laws from 1948 that "[...] they<br />

regard all Negro lodges as clandestine, illegal and un-Masonic, and [...] they<br />

regard as highly censurable the course <strong>of</strong> any Grand Lodge in the United States<br />

which shall recognize such bodies <strong>of</strong> Negroes as Masonic Lodges." 246 That the<br />

economic reasons for excluding the colored people are but alibi reasons becomes<br />

obvious when we consider the strong antipathy <strong>of</strong> many whites towards the black<br />

race. Several Caucasian Masons did not dispute the common creator <strong>of</strong> both<br />

black and white Masons, but declared the latter unfit for certain things, which<br />

they based on their conception <strong>of</strong> "scientific ethnology":<br />

No Negro ever born is the social or moral peer <strong>of</strong> a white man ... To<br />

return to the question [...], we will say 'the colored folk' are the creatures<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same Creator as ourselves, but so are Kentucky mules. <strong>The</strong><br />

Negroes have many good traits, but they cannot make Masons any more<br />

than they would make good husbands for our daughters. 247<br />

<strong>The</strong> exclusion <strong>of</strong> black Masons from the white fraternity cannot be based on<br />

religious arguments, either. Black Freemasons do not enter this institution with a<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> "bush religion" but manifest their belief in monotheism and swear on the<br />

Bible. When they remain unrecognized by certain white American lodges in<br />

spite <strong>of</strong> this, it must be a case <strong>of</strong> pure racism, as a former Grand Master <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Grand Orient de France states. He further remarks that French Masonry has<br />

always had friendly relations with the Prince Hall fraternity:<br />

Depuis toujours, les loges maçonniques françaises comptent, en leurs<br />

rangs, des francs-maçons de couleur, et le Grand Orient de France<br />

entretient des relations fraternelles avec la maçonnerie de Prince-Hall,<br />

dont les représentants qualifiés viennent chaque année saluer<br />

solennellement son assemblée générale, c'est-à-dire le convent. Ils sont<br />

reçus avec les mêmes honneurs que les dignitaires des autres puissances<br />

245<br />

Quoted in Walkes, A Prince Hall Masonic Quiz Book, p. 79.<br />

246<br />

Ibid, p. 78/80.<br />

247<br />

Ibid, p. 86, from fraternal correspondence from the 1940s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!