28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 9 - Masonic and Anti-Masonic Literature 739<br />

sheep, too. But it should be said that, according to "Masonic manners," the whole<br />

affair was a pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> very "un-Masonic conduct" <strong>of</strong> several individuals that was<br />

certainly not appreciated by Masonry as an institution. <strong>The</strong> question <strong>of</strong> who has<br />

murdered Morgan - if at all - has never been solved.<br />

A few words should be said here about the impact <strong>of</strong> the Morgan scandal on<br />

black <strong>Freemasonry</strong>. Interestingly, there was no harm done to Prince Hall<br />

Masonry, on the contrary. While the Order came close to disintegration among<br />

the whites, the black Masons even pr<strong>of</strong>ited from the affair:<br />

While almost fatal for white Masonry, the agitation was harmless to the<br />

blacks. Apparently the anti-Masons did not see any danger to<br />

equalitarian democracy in the aristocratic pretensions <strong>of</strong> black free men.<br />

Indeed, the hard times the whites experienced provided new<br />

opportunities for Prince Hall Masons. Some 'unemployed' white<br />

Masonic degree instructors found jobs in teaching blacks some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

higher ritual <strong>of</strong> the Order, while others asked the assistance <strong>of</strong> blacks in<br />

carrying out their Masonic work when a quorum could not be raised. 1833<br />

Linguistically, the Morgan scandal had the consequence that some<br />

neologisms came up, such as "a good-enough-Morgan," that was also employed<br />

by classical authors. Thus, Herman Melville, in <strong>The</strong> Confidence-Man: His<br />

Masquerade lets his con-man make the following remark: "That corpse <strong>of</strong><br />

calamity which the gloomy philosopher parades, is but his Good-Enough-<br />

Morgan." 1834 A footnote to this unusual statement names an adequate substitute<br />

for this expression: "any device, scheme, etc., which can be used temporarily to<br />

influence voters," which is a quotation from the Dictionary <strong>of</strong> Americanisms.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n, the footnote gives a sketch <strong>of</strong> William Morgan's presumed fate, stating<br />

that the anti-Masonic Thurlow Weed answered a jest <strong>of</strong> an attorney for the<br />

Masons by calling a body identified as Morgan's "a good-enough Morgan for us<br />

until you bring back the one you carried <strong>of</strong>f." <strong>The</strong> press, however, quickly<br />

changed this into "good-enough Morgan until after the election." 1835 We can see<br />

that the entry in the Dictionary <strong>of</strong> Americanisms has employed Weed's alleged<br />

intention as ascribed to him by the press, so that Morgan could become a<br />

synonym to a scheme to influence voters.<br />

Another neologism is "Morganry." Duncan used it in his exposé <strong>of</strong> the Craft<br />

ritual when describing the ceremony <strong>of</strong> "shock <strong>of</strong> enlightenment": "In some<br />

Lodges, at the last word, 'light,' the brethren stamp their feet and clap their hands<br />

once; but this is nearly done away with, now-a-days. Too much 'Morganry' about<br />

it, as it is styled by Masons." 1836 Thus, the American Masons <strong>of</strong> the second half<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 19 th century seem to have applied the term "Morganry" to those<br />

ceremonies that appeared too exaggerated in their eyes, alluding to the exposé<br />

1833<br />

Muraskin, p. 36.<br />

1834<br />

Parker (ed.), p. 41. For a corresponding explanation <strong>of</strong> this term, see also Lang, p. 121.<br />

1835<br />

Parker (ed.), p. 41.<br />

1836<br />

Duncan, p. 35.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!