28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

358<br />

Chapter 6 - Peculiarities <strong>of</strong> Masonic <strong>Language</strong><br />

own forms <strong>of</strong> jurisprudence. <strong>The</strong>re are three instances exercising judicial<br />

authority: Supreme Councils, Grand Lodges, and lodges. Of course, the power <strong>of</strong><br />

the lodges is limited to the penal jurisdiction over the members <strong>of</strong> the very lodge,<br />

and the Grand Lodge has the final say. 1117 As defined in the GHCDF, Masonic<br />

jurisdiction is, "[i]n its general sense, the power or right to exercise authority. All<br />

Lodges working within the territorial limits <strong>of</strong> a Grand Lodge are under its<br />

control and jurisdiction." 1118 <strong>The</strong> Masonic jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the whole territory <strong>of</strong><br />

the United States was divided between the Southern and Northern Supreme<br />

Councils in 1813. 1119<br />

Masonic administration <strong>of</strong> justice is comparable to the civil law, but limited<br />

to Masonic territory. Coil puts it as follows in his Masonic encyclopedia:<br />

"Masonic jurisdiction somewhat resembles that <strong>of</strong> the civil law; acts or conduct<br />

<strong>of</strong> a body outside its scope <strong>of</strong> power are ultra vires and void, while those which<br />

violate minor rules may be cured." 1120 According to Coil, Masonic jurisdiction <strong>of</strong><br />

Grand Lodges can be classified into territory matter, subject matter, and<br />

personal matter. 1121 Generally, the territorial limits <strong>of</strong> a Grand Lodge are<br />

determined by the political boundaries <strong>of</strong> the country in which it is situated. For<br />

example, the territorial limits <strong>of</strong> the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> New York are<br />

circumscribed within the settled boundaries <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> New York, and the<br />

Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> New York thus cannot grant a warrant <strong>of</strong> constitution to any<br />

lodge situated in another State. This would be an infringement <strong>of</strong> Masonic usage.<br />

Until the formation <strong>of</strong> a Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> France, the lodges <strong>of</strong> France held<br />

their allegiance to the Grand Lodge <strong>of</strong> England, and the Grand Lodges <strong>of</strong><br />

England, Scotland, and France granted warrants to lodges in America until after<br />

the revolution. From then on, the States began to organize their own Grand<br />

Lodges. However, in continental European Masonry we can notice differences<br />

with regard to the American and English usage in dealing with this territorial<br />

matter:<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> avoiding collision and unfriendly feeling, it has<br />

become the settled usage, that when a Grand Lodge has been legally<br />

organized in a State, all the Lodges within its limits must surrender the<br />

charters which they have received from foreign bodies, and accept new<br />

ones from the newly established Grand Lodge. This is the settled and<br />

well-recognized law <strong>of</strong> American and English Masonry. But the<br />

continental Masons, and especially the Germans, have not so rigidly<br />

interpreted this law <strong>of</strong> unoccupied territory; and there have been in<br />

1117 Such Grand Lodge rules are published in Masonic Books <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, Ahiman Rezons,<br />

and Codes. For a detailed description cf. our chapter 9 on literature.<br />

1118 GHCDF, p. 559.<br />

1119 According to EOF, p. 374, by the concession <strong>of</strong> 1813 the Northern Supreme Council has<br />

jurisdiction over the States <strong>of</strong> Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island,<br />

Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, and Indiana. All the<br />

other States and territories are under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the Southern Supreme Council.<br />

1120 CME, p. 342.<br />

1121 Cf. ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!