28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

822<br />

Chapter 10 - Conclusion<br />

to over-value the old doctrines, in contrast to the Grand Orient de France who<br />

broke them for humanitarian values. <strong>The</strong> landmarks are "tradition," a thing that is<br />

sacred to the Freemasons, first <strong>of</strong> all the American and English ones. <strong>The</strong> natural<br />

opponents <strong>of</strong> tradition and universality are innovation and change. Although one<br />

might argue that renewal is necessary if the wisdom <strong>of</strong> the ancients is to be not<br />

only remembered, but also lived out in the present time, some Masonic writers<br />

express their unwillingness to accept any up-dating <strong>of</strong> rituals, rules, and customs.<br />

In Mackey's Encyclopædia <strong>of</strong> <strong>Freemasonry</strong> and its Kindred Sciences, there is the<br />

following entry under "innovations": "<strong>The</strong>re is a well-known maxim <strong>of</strong> the law<br />

which says Omnis innovatio plus novitate perturbat quam utilitate prodest, that<br />

is, every innovation occasions more harm and disarrangement by its novelty than<br />

benefit by its actual utility." 1995 <strong>The</strong> encyclopedia further explains that<br />

[t]his maxim is peculiarly applicable to <strong>Freemasonry</strong>, whose system is<br />

opposed to all innovations. Thus, Dr. Dalcho says, in his Ahiman Rezon<br />

(p. 191), "Antiquity is dear to a Mason's heart; innovation is treason,<br />

and saps the venerable fabric <strong>of</strong> the Order."<br />

In accordance with this sentiment, we find the installation charges <strong>of</strong><br />

the Master <strong>of</strong> a Lodge affirming that "it is not in the power <strong>of</strong> any man<br />

or body <strong>of</strong> men to make innovations in the body <strong>of</strong> Masonry." 1996<br />

If the statement by Dalcho stood alone, it would mean that all inventors <strong>of</strong><br />

new Masonic rituals and degrees were traitors to their institution. However,<br />

Mackey avoids the issue by concluding that the phrase "body <strong>of</strong> Masonry" refers<br />

to its "landmarks," which are declared unalterable, and that the "non-essentials,<br />

such as the local and general regulations and the lectures, are not included in this<br />

term." 1997 However, the landmarks are a rather ambiguous term, nobody knowing<br />

exactly what they are, and several Masonic jurisdictions other than the American<br />

one do not believe in their existence at all:<br />

What are the landmarks? Is a question <strong>of</strong>ten asked, but never<br />

determinately answered. In ancient times, boundary-stones were used as<br />

landmarks, before title-deeds were known, the removal <strong>of</strong> which was<br />

strictly forbidden by law. With respect to the landmarks <strong>of</strong> Masonry,<br />

some restrict them to the O. B. 1998 signs, tokens, and words. Others<br />

include the ceremonies <strong>of</strong> initiation, passing, and raising; and the form,<br />

dimensions, and support; the ground, situation, and covering; the<br />

ornaments, furniture, and jewels <strong>of</strong> a Lodge, or their characteristic<br />

symbols. Some think that the Order has no landmarks beyond its<br />

peculiar secrets. It is quite clear, however, that the order against<br />

1995 EFKS, p. 353.<br />

1996 Ibid.<br />

1997 EFKS, p. 353.<br />

1998 "O. B." means "obligation."

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!