28.02.2013 Views

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

The Universal Language of Freemasonry - ArchiMeD - Johannes ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3 - Overview <strong>of</strong> Rites 85<br />

long ago they were not admitted to serve in the army, and as far as mining is<br />

concerned, they are still not allowed to work below ground - for moral as well as<br />

for physical reasons. Other countries have more modern ideas in these sectors. In<br />

1926, a German Mason could published the following - which still is the opinion<br />

<strong>of</strong> many individual Masons today:<br />

Die Freimaurerei beruht auf der Gleichheit der Mitglieder im Tempel;<br />

dieser Grundsatz könnte bei der Zulassung von Frauen aus Gründen der<br />

feinen Sitte nicht aufrechterhalten bleiben. Zu bedenken ist auch, daß<br />

die Anwesenheit von Frauen bei den unter scharfem Ausschlusse der<br />

Oeffentlichkeit stattfindenden Tempelarbeiten das Gerede über die<br />

Freimaurerei, das ohne dies recht umfangreich ist, noch vergrößern und<br />

vermehren würde. Deshalb glauben wir deutsche Freimaurer das<br />

Vorbild einer Gruppe Franzosen nicht nachahmen zu können, die unter<br />

dem Namen "Droit humain" gemischte Logen [...] gegründet haben. [...]<br />

Wir wissen die Macht des weiblichen Gemütes besonders bei unserer<br />

Wohltätigkeitspflege zu schätzen und wir suchen dazu unsere<br />

Bundesgenossen vorzugsweise in den Reihen unserer Schwestern.<br />

Trotzdem glauben wir sie mit guten Gründen den Arbeiten im Tempel<br />

fernhalten zu müssen. 233<br />

Fluhrer, the author <strong>of</strong> this quotation, expresses the thought <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> his<br />

contemporaries. He sees the "demureness" <strong>of</strong> the lodge endangered by the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> women. And he fears for its "secrecy." He stresses the giving <strong>of</strong><br />

charity, in which he sees the favorite task <strong>of</strong> women, and which makes them<br />

useful for the male lodge. But generally, their most hindering character trait is<br />

gossiping, and therefore they cannot be allowed to know the secret work <strong>of</strong> the<br />

order also. <strong>The</strong> German brethren did not even invent a substitute <strong>of</strong> lasting<br />

importance for the women. Of course, there have always been attempts in<br />

Masonic history, and also in German Masonic history, to establish clubs, circles,<br />

and orders for women, but they have nothing to do with real <strong>Freemasonry</strong>.<br />

We can compare this statement to the reasoning <strong>of</strong> male Masons in our<br />

chapters on mixed American rituals, the Order <strong>of</strong> the Eastern Star and the<br />

Amaranth. <strong>The</strong> American brethren have invented androgynous orders to provide<br />

the whining women with a substitute, a kind <strong>of</strong> Masonry for their own use. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

assigned to the women the role <strong>of</strong> giving and receiving charity. In the late 1800s,<br />

when these American co-Masonic orders were founded, the state did not provide<br />

social insurance, and therefore it was important for male Masons, who had a<br />

fraternal benefit system, to make sure that their female relatives were equally<br />

well protected. Thus, they gave them some nice Biblical ceremony and some<br />

very secret hand signs and passwords, so that the women "could make<br />

themselves known" to a Masonic brother when they were in distress.<br />

Furthermore, they were pacified and could play their own "ritual." This was<br />

certainly a good thing in those times, but nowadays? We are not arguing that the<br />

233 Fluhrer, p. 12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!