10.12.2012 Views

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

102 4. the successors <strong>of</strong> justinian<br />

perhaps, was the typical fate <strong>of</strong> a reformer who was unable to complete his<br />

intended changes.<br />

2. Eastern warfare<br />

As his replacement in charge <strong>of</strong> the eastern armies, Maurice initially<br />

appointed his former subordinate, John Mystacon, who continued operations<br />

in Arzanene in autumn 582 and then through 583 with mixed<br />

success. 36 Arzanene was a vulnerable salient <strong>of</strong> Persian territory, control <strong>of</strong><br />

which would allow the Romans to consolidate their hold on Armenia to the<br />

north. For 584 Maurice appointed a new general, his brother-in-law<br />

Philippicus; negotiations occupied the first part <strong>of</strong> the year, possibly<br />

another Persian delaying tactic, but in autumn 584 and through 585<br />

Philippicus ravaged the plains <strong>of</strong> Beth Arabaye near Nisibis and continued<br />

operations in Arzanene, though progress slowed when Philippicus fell ill.<br />

Raiding into Syria by Rome’s former allies, the Ghassanid Arabs, who had<br />

been alienated by the arrest and punishment <strong>of</strong> their king, al-Mundhir, may<br />

also have caused disruption.<br />

In 586 activity seems to have been on a different scale. Philippicus<br />

thwarted a Persian invasion <strong>of</strong> Upper Mesopotamia with victory in a<br />

pitched battle at Solachon in the plains south <strong>of</strong> Mardin, and thereafter<br />

returned his attentions to Arzanene. Although unsuccessful in an attack on<br />

the main city, Chlomaron, which Maurice had also failed to capture in 578,<br />

the Romans maintained the initiative during the rest <strong>of</strong> the year, building<br />

or capturing strategic forts and raiding deep into Persia; Philippicus’ ill<br />

health meant that much <strong>of</strong> this activity was conducted by Heraclius, the<br />

father <strong>of</strong> the future emperor, and other subordinate commanders.<br />

During winter 587/8 there were two developments: Priscus was<br />

appointed to replace Philippicus, and he was ordered to introduce a reduction<br />

in military pay, a move whose unpopularity may have been <strong>of</strong>fset by<br />

improvements in conditions <strong>of</strong> service. Priscus’ arrival at the camp at<br />

Monocarton was unhappy, and the army mutinied during the Easter festival:<br />

Priscus was forced to retire to Edessa, his attempts to reconcile the<br />

troops were rebuffed, and the mutineers chose as leader Germanus, duke<br />

<strong>of</strong> Phoenicia. The mutiny persisted for a whole year, until Easter 589, but<br />

the Persians were surprisingly unable to exploit this opportunity, which<br />

may reveal the extent <strong>of</strong> Roman successes in recent years. Germanus<br />

indeed defeated the Persians near Martyropolis and sent 3,000 captives to<br />

Constantinople as a gesture <strong>of</strong> allegiance to Maurice. The troops were<br />

finally won back through a combination <strong>of</strong> imperial emissaries, who disbursed<br />

normal payments, and exhortations from Gregory, patriarch <strong>of</strong><br />

36 For discussion <strong>of</strong> these years, see Whitby, Maurice 276–92.<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Hi</strong>stories Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!