10.12.2012 Views

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the cities <strong>of</strong> the east 213<br />

statues, statues <strong>of</strong> governors and inscribed imperial decrees continued to<br />

be displayed in provincial capitals, at least – certainly at Ephesus. After<br />

some resistance, the imperial government sanctioned the transfer <strong>of</strong> civic<br />

funds, statues and even building materials from ordinary cities to the provincial<br />

capital. 40<br />

Great centres like Ephesus or Antioch, and provincial capitals like<br />

Corinth or Aphrodisias, retained their classical monumentality into the mid<br />

sixth century and beyond. 41 But it seems that in places which were not<br />

centres <strong>of</strong> government the decay <strong>of</strong> buildings characteristic <strong>of</strong> classical city<br />

life <strong>of</strong>ten began much earlier. Gymnasia went out <strong>of</strong> use, and were built<br />

over or fell into ruin. Public spaces such as theatres or colonnaded streets<br />

were invaded by shoddy structures. The agora might be built over, and<br />

sometimes even aqueducts were allowed to decay, although it appears that,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the classical amenities, baths were maintained, and even new ones built,<br />

when other monumental public buildings had been abandoned. 42 In central<br />

and northern Asia Minor especially, where the emergence <strong>of</strong> classical cities<br />

had been closely linked with Roman rule under the early empire, 43 there is<br />

very little evidence, whether inscriptions or remains <strong>of</strong> buildings or indeed<br />

objects <strong>of</strong> any kind, that suggests conspicuously urban activity after, say,<br />

the early fourth century. If such places continued to have bishops, as is suggested<br />

by their continuing to figure on bishops’ lists, it is likely that the<br />

bishops presided over what were little more than large fortified villages. 44<br />

The imperial government was aware <strong>of</strong> the development and tried to<br />

maintain the monumental appearance <strong>of</strong> cities, 45 not, in the long run, successfully.<br />

Unfortunately, it is not yet possible to tell the story <strong>of</strong> the decline<br />

<strong>of</strong> classical urbanism in detail or even, except in a few cases, to provide a<br />

chronology. Of the excavations that have taken place, too few have been<br />

concerned to answer this kind <strong>of</strong> question. The decline <strong>of</strong> classical urbanism<br />

did not, in any case, necessarily mean that cities ceased to be centres <strong>of</strong><br />

population. Indeed, the building on previously open spaces implies that<br />

there was a need for more houses and shops. In some towns there may well<br />

have been a shift in the location <strong>of</strong> population. Early churches were sited<br />

on the periphery <strong>of</strong> cities, and it is quite conceivable that the population<br />

sometimes tended to group round churches on the edge <strong>of</strong> the cities,<br />

leaving the centres empty – a development which was common in the<br />

western provinces.<br />

40 C.Th. xv.1.18 <strong>of</strong> 374, 26 <strong>of</strong> 390, 37 <strong>of</strong> 398.<br />

41 The evidence for undiminished secular monumentality and continued secular building in the writings<br />

<strong>of</strong> Foss (see Bibliography) is derived mainly from cities like these, which are the cities which in the<br />

sixth century had a financial <strong>of</strong>ficial entitled ‘father <strong>of</strong> the city’; see Roueché (1979).<br />

42 Scott (1987), Crawford (1990) 6 – Sardis; Brandes (1989) 88 – Priene, 95 – <strong>Hi</strong>erapolis, 108 –<br />

Caesarea in Cappadocia, 110 – Pergamum – 115 Cycicus, 120 – Anemurion (for Anemurion see also<br />

Russell in Hohlfelder (1982) 133–4). 43 Mitchell, Anatolia i.81–98.<br />

44 Mitchell, Anatolia ii.120–1. 45 C.Th. xv.1.1 (357), 14 (365), 37 (398); xv.5.1 (372), 3 (409).<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Hi</strong>stories Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!