10.12.2012 Views

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 22c<br />

THE ARABS*<br />

lawrence i. conrad<br />

i. introduction: the question <strong>of</strong> sources<br />

In the present state <strong>of</strong> our knowledge it is not difficult to describe the physical<br />

setting for pre-Islamic Arabian history, and new archaeological discoveries<br />

in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Jordan and the Gulf are producing much<br />

valuable and unique evidence. Over the past century a vast body <strong>of</strong> epigraphical<br />

material – some 50,000 north and south Arabian inscriptions and the<br />

inscribed sticks now emerging by the hundreds in northern Yemen – has provided<br />

a wealth <strong>of</strong> information on the societies <strong>of</strong> the peninsula, especially<br />

the bedouins. 1 But all this seldom provides a coherent picture <strong>of</strong> the course<br />

<strong>of</strong> events, as opposed to vignettes and bare details, and thus does not replace<br />

a literary historical tradition. There are external epigraphic records <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Arabs and Arabia, and historical sources – especially in Greek and Syriac –<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten helpful. 2 But this information too is pr<strong>of</strong>oundly discontinuous, and<br />

in any case represents the perspective <strong>of</strong> outsiders who regarded the Arabs<br />

as barbarian marauders and most <strong>of</strong> Arabia as a menacing wasteland. 3<br />

There is voluminous material on the subject in the Arabic sources, but<br />

herein lies the problem. 4 The relevant accounts, including a vast bulk <strong>of</strong><br />

poetry, are frequently attributed to the pre-Islamic period or otherwise presented<br />

as describing events and conditions <strong>of</strong> that time, but apart from the<br />

Qur�ān the sources containing these accounts are at least two centuries<br />

later. In times past it seemed reasonable simply to compare the various<br />

accounts to determine which seemed most likely to be true. More recently,<br />

however, it has become clear that the Arabic sources on the Arabs in pre-<br />

Islamic Arabia – and indeed, on the first century <strong>of</strong> Islamic history as a<br />

whole – represent a fluid corpus that adopted a range <strong>of</strong> argumentative<br />

views on issues important at the time the accounts were being transmitted<br />

and the sources compiled; the result was the colouring and reshaping <strong>of</strong><br />

* I would like to thank Fidelity and William Lancaster and Michael Macdonald for their valuable<br />

comments and suggestions.<br />

1 See, e.g., Robin (1991); Macdonald (1995a).<br />

2 See Papathomopoulos (1984); Segal (1984); MacAdam (1989).<br />

3 On the distorted image <strong>of</strong> bedouins among settled folk, see Shaw 1982–3.<br />

4 Two still-valuable overviews are Olinder (1927) 11–19; Caskel (1927–30).<br />

678<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Hi</strong>stories Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!