10.12.2012 Views

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

family and friendship in the west 421<br />

anything is known. 38 It is perhaps significant that Ennodius does not name<br />

the parents <strong>of</strong> his nephew Parthenius, since the boy’s mother seems to have<br />

married below her social station. 39 Marriage within a confined social group<br />

seems to have continued to be the norm among the aristocracy for much<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sixth century. It is clear that both sides <strong>of</strong> Gregory <strong>of</strong> Tours’ family<br />

were <strong>of</strong> the same status, and that he held his maternal and paternal relatives<br />

in equal regard. Among the clerics he revered in his family were a paternal<br />

uncle, Gallus <strong>of</strong> Clermont, 40 and a maternal uncle, Nicetius <strong>of</strong> Lyons, 41<br />

each <strong>of</strong> whom was partially responsible for his upbringing. 42 Gregory, who<br />

was encouraged to write by his mother, 43 <strong>of</strong>fers a very even coverage <strong>of</strong><br />

both sides <strong>of</strong> his family in his Ten Books <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hi</strong>stories, and in his hagiography.<br />

44<br />

Gregory provides evidence for numerous generations <strong>of</strong> his family,<br />

theoretically going as far back, in one case, as the second century. 45 The<br />

letter collections <strong>of</strong> the fifth and sixth century are not so wide-ranging in<br />

their chronological coverage, although they perhaps give more intimate<br />

insights into attitudes towards the family. Sidonius’ comment on the paternal<br />

and maternal kin <strong>of</strong> Aper might be seen as something <strong>of</strong> a rhetorical<br />

flourish. Not so his outburst after some peasants had accidentally disturbed<br />

his paternal grandfather’s grave, which led him to horsewhip them, and<br />

then to consider setting up a proper monument. 46 On his own parents he<br />

is remarkably silent, more so than on his father-in-law, although this may<br />

say more about power and patronage than about family structures, since<br />

Avitus was not only Sidonius’ father-in-law but also, briefly, emperor, and<br />

as such, inevitably, Sidonius’ patron. 47 More intimate are Sidonius’ letters<br />

to and about his son Apollinaris, which describe his attempts to provide<br />

him with a literary education, teaching him Terence, and which lament his<br />

failure. 48 These are all the more interesting because the letter collections <strong>of</strong><br />

Ruricius and Avitus <strong>of</strong> Vienne reveal Apollinaris as an arbiter <strong>of</strong> taste in<br />

the next generation, 49 suggesting that some <strong>of</strong> Sidonius’ lessons ultimately<br />

did bear fruit.<br />

For Avitus <strong>of</strong> Vienne, Sidonius, probably his maternal uncle, was Sidonius<br />

meus. 50 For Ruricius <strong>of</strong> Limoges Sidonius was a more distant relative, 51 but<br />

38 Stroheker (1948); Wood (1992) 10–11.<br />

39 Ennodius xciv, ed. F. Vogel, MGH, AA 7 (Berlin 1885). 40 Greg. Tur. Liber Vitae Patrum vi.<br />

41 Greg. Tur. Liber Vitae Patrum viii. 42 Van Dam (1993) 52–62.<br />

43 Greg. Tur. Liber de Virtutibus sancti Martini i pref., ed. B. Krusch, MGH, SRM 1 (2); Greg. Tur. <strong>Hi</strong>st.<br />

pref., ed. B. Krusch and W. Levison, MGH, SRM 1 (Hanover 1951). 44 Van Dam (1993) 50–81.<br />

45 On Vettius Epagathus, Greg. Tur. <strong>Hi</strong>st. i.29, 31. On his relationship with Gregory’s family, Greg.<br />

Tur. Liber Vitae Patrum vi.1. 46 Sid. Ap. Ep. 3.12; Wood (1996). 47 Harries (1994) 31.<br />

48 Sid. Ap. Epp. 4.12.1; 9.1.5. On the significance <strong>of</strong> literature for the Gallo-Roman aristocracy <strong>of</strong><br />

the fifth and sixth century, Mathisen (1993) 105–18.<br />

49 Ruricius, Epp. 2.26.41, ed. B. Krusch, MGH, AA 8 (Berlin 1887); Avitus, Ep. 51, ed. R. Peiper,<br />

MGH, AA 6 (2) (Berlin 1883). 50 Avitus, Ep. 51. On the relationship, Mathisen (1981) 97–100.<br />

51 On the relationship, Mathisen (1981) 101–3; Stroheker (1948) 209–10.<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Hi</strong>stories Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!