10.12.2012 Views

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

Cambridge Ancient Hi.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 28<br />

PHILOSOPHY AND PHILOSOPHICAL SCHOOLS 1<br />

anne sheppard<br />

i. introduction<br />

The dominant pagan philosophy <strong>of</strong> the fifth and sixth century a.d. was<br />

Neoplatonism. By this period Platonism had absorbed the other philosophical<br />

traditions <strong>of</strong> antiquity. Aristotle was extensively studied but in a<br />

Platonist context, and usually as a preparation for the study <strong>of</strong> Plato himself.<br />

Epicureanism and Scepticism had faded away. Many elements <strong>of</strong> Stoicism<br />

do reappear in Neoplatonist logic and metaphysics but altered and transposed<br />

so as to fit into a very different philosophical system: the Stoics were<br />

materialists, whereas for the Neoplatonists the intelligible world is not only<br />

distinct from the material one but superior to it in reality and power.<br />

Neoplatonism was initiated by Plotinus in the third century and continued<br />

into the fourth by Porphyry, Iamblichus and their followers; by 425 it had<br />

spread all over the Mediterranean world. There were several different<br />

schools, in the physical sense, and this chapter will consider those in order.<br />

I shall begin with the school <strong>of</strong> Athens, proceed to Alexandria and then<br />

conclude with a brief account <strong>of</strong> philosophy elsewhere in the empire. The<br />

two principal schools were in Athens and Alexandria. These schools have<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten been seen as differing in doctrines and attitudes as well as in their geographical<br />

location. However, recent research has undermined this conventional<br />

picture. 2 I shall argue later in the chapter that there were some genuine<br />

differences in emphasis and attitude between the two schools. However,<br />

they both derived from the Iamblichean tradition <strong>of</strong> Neoplatonism, and I<br />

shall begin by summarizing the main features <strong>of</strong> that tradition.<br />

The contrast between an intelligible world, accessible only to the mind,<br />

1 Several biographical works are important sources for the history <strong>of</strong> philosophy in this period:<br />

Marinus, Life <strong>of</strong> Proclus (English translation in Rosán (1949); discussion in Blumenthal (1984));<br />

Damascius, Life <strong>of</strong> Isidorus (discussion <strong>of</strong> the period heavily based on Damascius in Athanassiadi (1993),<br />

and see now P. Athanassiadi, Damascius, The Philosophical <strong>Hi</strong>story (Athens, 1999)); Zacharias, Life <strong>of</strong><br />

Severus. For bibliography on individual philosophers see Sorabji (1990) 485ff., with the addition <strong>of</strong><br />

H<strong>of</strong>fmann (1994) on Damascius. For the archaeological evidence see Frantz (1988), Roueché,<br />

Aphrodisias 85–6, Fowden (1990a), Smith (1990).<br />

2 The Athenian and Alexandrian schools were sharply distinguished in Praechter (1910). For the case<br />

against Praechter see, in the first instance, Hadot (1978). For a recent, balanced discussion see<br />

Blumenthal (1993).<br />

835<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> <strong>Hi</strong>stories Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!