29.01.2015 Views

SEMNAS Hortikultura Buku 2 - Departemen Pertanian

SEMNAS Hortikultura Buku 2 - Departemen Pertanian

SEMNAS Hortikultura Buku 2 - Departemen Pertanian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Application of Chemical and Bio-Fertilizers in Relation to String Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Yield and Soil-Borne<br />

Pathogen<br />

Mulyadi, Pustika, A. B. and Iswadi, A<br />

K fertilizer applied the higher pod yield obtained which the highest pod yield, i. e. 15.94 t/ha, was<br />

obtained by N, P, and K fertilizer applications at high rate (treatment H). This pod yield was<br />

significant higher around of 0.90 t/ha compared to pod yields that obtained by N, P, and K fertilizer<br />

applications at medium and low rates (treatment M and L).<br />

Table 3. Effects of bio-fertilizer and chemical fertilizer applications on the dry matter and pod yields<br />

of string bean planted on soil formed from volcanic sediment in Pakem, Sleman Regency.<br />

Chemical<br />

Fertilizer<br />

Treatments<br />

Bio-fertilizer Treatments<br />

E-1 (E-2) MU MC Control<br />

Dry matter yield (t/ha)<br />

Mean<br />

L 0.82 a 1 0.81 a 0.79 a 0.73 a 0.78 a 0.79 A<br />

M 0.77 a 0.75 a 0.70 a 0.73 a 0.87 a 0.77 A<br />

H 0.84 a 0.88 a 0.83 a 0.72 a 0.80 a 0.81 A<br />

Mean<br />

0.81 A 0.81 A 0.77 A 0.73 A 0.82 A<br />

Fresh Pod yield (t/ha)<br />

L 15.70 a 15.05 b 14.60 a 14.40 a 14.67 a 14.88 B<br />

M 15.85 a 15.43 ab 14.20 a 14.20 a 15.78 a 15.09 AB<br />

H 16.20 a 16.71 a 16.10 a 14.90 a 15.81 a 15.94 A<br />

Mean<br />

15.92 A 15.73 A 14.97 A 14.50 A 15.42 A<br />

Dry pod yield (t/ha)<br />

L 0.94 a 0.90 b 0.86 a 0.85 a 0.88 a 0.90 B<br />

M 0.95 a 0.93 ab 0.85 a 0.85 a 0.95 a 0.94 AB<br />

H 0.97 a 1.00 a 0.96 a 0.89 a 0.95 a 0.97 A<br />

Mean<br />

0.95 A 0.94 A 0.89 A 0.86 A 0.92 A<br />

1 Means separation at 5% level (LSD); capital letters between mean values, small letters between chemical<br />

fertilizer values.<br />

The Effect of Bio-fertilizers on Wilt Disease Intensity<br />

Wilt disease intensity on bio-fertilized string bean was significantly lower than control (Table<br />

4). Wilt disease intensity on bio-fertilized plants was < 0.067%, while on control was 0.233%. Wilt<br />

disease could be caused by Fusarium spp. and Ralstonia spp. which were associated with plants.<br />

Table 4. Wilt disease intensity on string bean applied by different bio-fertilizer<br />

Bio-fertilizer Treatment Wilt Disease Intensity (%)<br />

E1 0.000<br />

E2 0.067<br />

MU 0.000<br />

MC 0.000<br />

Control 0.233<br />

The low value of disease intensity on plants treated by bio-fertilizers was caused by complex<br />

interactions between the plant, the pathogen, the arbuscular mychorrizas (AM) fungi, and the<br />

microbial community on and around the plant. Harrier and Watson (2004) reported that AM are<br />

particularly important in organic and/or sustainable farming systems that rely on biological processes<br />

rather than agrochemicals to control plant diseases. Of particular importance is the bio-protection<br />

conferred to plants against many soil borne pathogens such as species of Aphanomyces,<br />

Cylindrocladium, Fusarium, Macrophomina, Phytophthora, Pythium, Rhizoctonia, Sclerotinium,<br />

Prosiding SeminarNasional Pekan Inovasi Teknologi <strong>Hortikultura</strong> Nasional: Penerapan Inovasi Teknologi <strong>Hortikultura</strong><br />

dalam Mendukung Pembangunan <strong>Hortikultura</strong> yang Berdaya Saing dan Berbasis Sumberdaya Genetik Lokal,<br />

Lembang, 5 Juli 2012<br />

│95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!