15.06.2013 Views

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C. FDI in Central and Eastern European Countries<br />

Central and Eastern European countries have witnessed a considerable<br />

increase of FDI inflows since the collapse of communism and the chance to join<br />

the European Union. FDI has been an important source of financing and a catalyst<br />

for the economic development for many of these nations. Therefore, while<br />

competing for FDI, countries tried to implement structural reforms aimed at<br />

improving their investment climate. Deichmann et al. (2003) found that the level of<br />

reforms is a significant positive determinant of FDI inflows into transition<br />

economies. Since FDI in developing countries is usually export-oriented, the<br />

policies that a host country implements are also designed to facilitate trade. Thus,<br />

FDI not just stimulates the growth of the economy but also accelerates international<br />

trade, which in turn favourably affects the economic growth of the country. The<br />

leading recipients of FDI in eastern/central Europe have been Poland, Czech<br />

Republic, Hungary and Slovakia. These countries were the first ones to reform<br />

their economies and they are among the first countries that joined the European<br />

Union in 2004.<br />

Investors in Central and Eastern European countries have a variety of motives<br />

when choosing a recipient of FDI. Lankes and Venables (1996) show that FDI<br />

projects in these countries are very heterogeneous and differ in terms of size,<br />

objectives, technology, location, ownership, and control requirements. Therefore,<br />

when assessing the impact of FDI, it is important to study it on a country-bycountry<br />

basis. Brenton and Di Mauro (1999) analyzed FDI inflows to the CEE<br />

countries, their results showing positive association of FDI to GDP, whereas<br />

market size, measured by population, does not appear to significantly influence<br />

FDI inflows. They also found that the distance coefficient was significantly<br />

negatively associated as cost of subsidiary managing, increases with the distance.<br />

Therefore, FDI may substitute exports in distant countries. Aturupane at al. (1999)<br />

and Walkenhorst (2001, 2004) found a positive correlation between trade and FDI<br />

in transition economies, suggesting that FDI and trade are complements, rather<br />

than substitutes in these countries.<br />

In another empirical analysis of FDI inflows to the CEE countries, Bevan and<br />

Estrin (2000) took the host country’s credit risk into account. Their results show<br />

that FDI is determined by the host country’s risk and size, labour costs and<br />

distance. They also found evidence that an announcement about future admission<br />

to the European Union had a direct and positive influence on FDI. Contrary to this<br />

study, Altomonte (2000) concluded that FDI appears to be influenced mostly by<br />

GDP per capita and population, but not by distance. In addition, in emerging and<br />

transition economies, certain sectors such as manufacturing and science-based<br />

development attract FDI, mainly due to lower labour costs.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!