15.06.2013 Views

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

inostrani kapital kao faktor razvoja zemalja - Ekonomski fakultet u ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

esponsible for maintaining the macroeconomic stability i.e. the high level<br />

of price stability, they are responsible for eliminating the cyclical<br />

movements and the system’s ability to handle economic crisis. This group<br />

of institutions comprises the Central bank, the foreign exchange regime,<br />

the budget and the fiscal rules. .<br />

• Institutions responsible for market legitimacy – these institutions are<br />

responsible for social care and social insurance; they are responsible for<br />

effectuating the income allocation and for relativization of the social<br />

conflicts. For instance, to this list belong: the pension system, the schemes<br />

for providing help in case of unemployment, and other social funds.<br />

Another essential aspect when explaining the term institutions is the<br />

possibility to empirically measure their quality. Namely, in the literature there are<br />

three criteria according to which is measured the quality of the institutions existing<br />

in one system:<br />

• Quality of governance (degree of corruption, political rights, public sector<br />

efficiency and quality of government regulation);<br />

• Degree of legal protection of private property;<br />

• Limits and restriction of the public elites.<br />

Subjectivism is pointed out as a major drawback of the above mentioned<br />

indicators because they are most often based on reports and perceptions deriving<br />

from domestic and foreign experts, representatives of international organizations or<br />

non-government organizations. Also, a restricting factor is the fact that in<br />

themselves they include phenomena and processes that are in their nature difficult<br />

to measure. However, no matter the presented restrictions, these indicators are<br />

valid and relevant for drawing conclusions about the quality of the institutions.<br />

2.2. Economic and Political Institutions vs. Organizations<br />

In order to provide a better explanations regarding the institutions that are in<br />

the focus of the New Institutional Economics analysis, at first it should be made<br />

distinction between institutions and organizations. Generally speaking, institutions<br />

are defined as rules of play i.e. restrictions created by people which are consisting<br />

part of the human interaction. These restrictions can have formal character<br />

(constitution, statute, common law and regulations) and informal character<br />

(conventions, norms of behavior and individual rules of behavior).<br />

Formal restrictions can be political or judicial, economic restrictions or<br />

contracts. Political restrictions determine the hierarchical structure of the society,<br />

the basic structure of decision making and the explicit objects of control. Economic<br />

restrictions define the property rights. Contracts consist of provisions that are<br />

specific for certain agreement or trade.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!